Nagpur: Even as the Union Cabinet licensed ordinance to restore 200-point roster on March 7, the Nagpur University (NU) is yet to clear its stand on which reservation mechanism system it's following.
In reality, an analysis of the 17 positions marketed for its performed college, Laxminarayan Institute of Technology (LIT), presentations a reserved category has been given more than 50% seats in some of the departments. Yet, yet another reserved post in similar category has been marketed in petrochemical generation division which already has two quota appointments but even so two unreserved.
As recruitment is underway, the filling up of this post as it's would result in any other sort of staffing imbalance at LIT. After recruitment, the dept can have two unreserved appointments while 3 teachers would come from similar category.
The move has been dubbed as ‘unfair’ by way of unreserved candidates.
On February eight, IdealNews had reported that the NU didn’t appear to be following either 200-point or the 13-point roster system in its employment notice for LIT.
On January 25, the NU marketed 17 posts treating LIT as one unit somewhat than distributing the quota as in keeping with the new UGC law. The 200-point roster imagine all the college as one unit while 13-point takes each and every division as a unit.
The marketed posts are for Chemical Engineering (CE), Chemical Technology (CT), Chemistry (CH) and Humanities (H). The NU has invited 12 applications for CT, 3 for CE, one each and every in CH and H. Five positions were kept reserved for SC, ST and VJ/NT while no allocation has been made for OBC and while the remainder are unreserved.
It is not clear which method the NU implemented to calculate the distribution of these posts. Irrespective of treating the distinguished institute as one unit or each and every of its division individually, the representation of reserved categories don’t seem in conformity with the apex frame’s norms or with the new 200-point system.
As in keeping with the 200-point roster system, the primary, 2nd, third, fifth and sixth are unreserved. The fourth, eight and 12th are earmarked for OBC while the seventh for SC and 14th for ST. Adding to this confusion, the Maratha quota too needs to be added to the roster.
Vice-chancellor SP Kane and appearing registrar Neeraj Khaty didn’t answer to TOI’s calls. IdealNews additionally emailed queries to Kane and Khaty, but they didn’t reply to them as neatly.
In reality, an analysis of the 17 positions marketed for its performed college, Laxminarayan Institute of Technology (LIT), presentations a reserved category has been given more than 50% seats in some of the departments. Yet, yet another reserved post in similar category has been marketed in petrochemical generation division which already has two quota appointments but even so two unreserved.
As recruitment is underway, the filling up of this post as it's would result in any other sort of staffing imbalance at LIT. After recruitment, the dept can have two unreserved appointments while 3 teachers would come from similar category.
The move has been dubbed as ‘unfair’ by way of unreserved candidates.
On February eight, IdealNews had reported that the NU didn’t appear to be following either 200-point or the 13-point roster system in its employment notice for LIT.
On January 25, the NU marketed 17 posts treating LIT as one unit somewhat than distributing the quota as in keeping with the new UGC law. The 200-point roster imagine all the college as one unit while 13-point takes each and every division as a unit.
The marketed posts are for Chemical Engineering (CE), Chemical Technology (CT), Chemistry (CH) and Humanities (H). The NU has invited 12 applications for CT, 3 for CE, one each and every in CH and H. Five positions were kept reserved for SC, ST and VJ/NT while no allocation has been made for OBC and while the remainder are unreserved.
It is not clear which method the NU implemented to calculate the distribution of these posts. Irrespective of treating the distinguished institute as one unit or each and every of its division individually, the representation of reserved categories don’t seem in conformity with the apex frame’s norms or with the new 200-point system.
As in keeping with the 200-point roster system, the primary, 2nd, third, fifth and sixth are unreserved. The fourth, eight and 12th are earmarked for OBC while the seventh for SC and 14th for ST. Adding to this confusion, the Maratha quota too needs to be added to the roster.
Vice-chancellor SP Kane and appearing registrar Neeraj Khaty didn’t answer to TOI’s calls. IdealNews additionally emailed queries to Kane and Khaty, but they didn’t reply to them as neatly.
LIT staffing imbalance: More than 50% reserved seats in a department
Reviewed by Kailash
on
March 20, 2019
Rating: