AHMEDABAD: The Gujarat HC dominated on Monday that a spouse can not fee her husband with marital rape despite the fact that the person has intercourse together with her without her consent if she is above 18 years of age.
Justice J B Pardiwala seen that the offence of rape by way of a husband is not an offence punishable underneath IPC Section 375, which defines rape. He lamented the position of a legislation which doesn't permit a woman to prosecute her husband for rape and referred to as for legal provisions in order that a woman can protect her frame the best way she has been enabled to give protection to her different rights.
The HC quoted, in nice element, legal provisions present in countries internationally on marital rape and seen that the legislature must criminalise the offence. He said the mere apprehension of its misuse by way of "unscrupulous" women will have to no longer be a deterrent to enacting regulation to give protection to women battered by way of marital rape, which is rampant in India. The HC said a spouse can initiate felony complaints in opposition to her husband for unnatural intercourse underneath IPC Section 377. Consent is not a figuring out criterion in this type of case. Any offence which is in opposition to the order of nature and can also be described as carnal penetration would constitute an offence underneath IPC Sec 377.
However, in a marital relationship, "except the sexual perversions of sodomy, buggery and bestiality, all other sexual perversions would not fall within the sweep of Sec 377 of the IPC", the HC said and seen that the fee of forced oral intercourse levelled by way of the woman in this case would no longer draw in the fee of sodomy. The HC added that forcing a spouse to have intercourse would draw in the fee of outraging the modesty of lady underneath IPC Sec 354.
Justice J B Pardiwala seen that the offence of rape by way of a husband is not an offence punishable underneath IPC Section 375, which defines rape. He lamented the position of a legislation which doesn't permit a woman to prosecute her husband for rape and referred to as for legal provisions in order that a woman can protect her frame the best way she has been enabled to give protection to her different rights.
The HC quoted, in nice element, legal provisions present in countries internationally on marital rape and seen that the legislature must criminalise the offence. He said the mere apprehension of its misuse by way of "unscrupulous" women will have to no longer be a deterrent to enacting regulation to give protection to women battered by way of marital rape, which is rampant in India. The HC said a spouse can initiate felony complaints in opposition to her husband for unnatural intercourse underneath IPC Section 377. Consent is not a figuring out criterion in this type of case. Any offence which is in opposition to the order of nature and can also be described as carnal penetration would constitute an offence underneath IPC Sec 377.
However, in a marital relationship, "except the sexual perversions of sodomy, buggery and bestiality, all other sexual perversions would not fall within the sweep of Sec 377 of the IPC", the HC said and seen that the fee of forced oral intercourse levelled by way of the woman in this case would no longer draw in the fee of sodomy. The HC added that forcing a spouse to have intercourse would draw in the fee of outraging the modesty of lady underneath IPC Sec 354.
Sex with wife without consent not rape: HC
![Sex with wife without consent not rape: HC]()
Reviewed by Kailash
on
April 03, 2018
Rating:
