NEW DELHI: The Delhi Development Authority (DDA) discovered itself at the receiving end of the Supreme Court on Thursday with the court hauling it up for the anti-encroachment pressure failing to act towards the rich who usurped pavements and side road areas out of doors their residences.
"There are big bungalows in the city which are encroaching on public land. Pavements and streets in front of these bungalows are used for building homes for guards. Why are you not taking action against them?" the court asked DDA.
As DDA positioned its standing document on its anti-encroachment pressure subsidized with images, a bench of Justices Madan B Lokur and Deepak Gupta slammed the agency for amending Delhi Master Plan 2021 in a hurry with out giving voters full opportunity to report objections. Significantly, the bench asked DDA to be able with an alternative plan in case the court negated the legislation providing immunity to unlawful structures and amendments to the master plan.
You should be sensible and practical and you must get ready a plan on what to do when the modification is struck down. There is an opportunity of it and you must have a plan B,” it said. Additional solicitor normal Maninder Singh said the authority was once no longer sparing any unlawful construction and the ones mentioned by way of the court would be demolished soon. He said the anti-encroachment pressure may just no longer be initiated around the city at one pass and it would be accomplished in levels. He assured the bench that suitable motion would be taken to remove the encroachments.
The bench additionally ticked off DDA for hurriedly amending the master plan to give protection to the passion of buyers who had been dealing with the warmth for sporting out industrial activities from residential premises. The court famous that DDA had given just three days’ understand to folks to report their objections to the proposed amendments. “For each and every affidavit, you seek at least four weeks’ time and even then you definitely fail to report a response in court. How can you say that strange folks be given just three days’ time whilst you seek a month’s time to report a response? There can't be different requirements for the typical man and the federal government authority,” the bench said.
DDA contended that the master plan had to be amended to accommodate an ever-growing inhabitants and it allowed combined land use to make sure folks accessed industrial job in proximity to the place they lived. It said the court’s issues regarding the affect of amendments on the surroundings and infrastructure of the town were examined in detail and there was once no illegality. The court is inspecting the validity of the Delhi Laws (Special Provisions) Act handed in 2006 to give protection to unlawful buildings and misuse of residential premises for industrial purposes. Though the legislation was once framed to provide twelve months of amnesty, the Centre has again and again prolonged the closing date via legislation, the final being in December, to give protection to unlawful buildings till 2020.
"There are big bungalows in the city which are encroaching on public land. Pavements and streets in front of these bungalows are used for building homes for guards. Why are you not taking action against them?" the court asked DDA.
As DDA positioned its standing document on its anti-encroachment pressure subsidized with images, a bench of Justices Madan B Lokur and Deepak Gupta slammed the agency for amending Delhi Master Plan 2021 in a hurry with out giving voters full opportunity to report objections. Significantly, the bench asked DDA to be able with an alternative plan in case the court negated the legislation providing immunity to unlawful structures and amendments to the master plan.
You should be sensible and practical and you must get ready a plan on what to do when the modification is struck down. There is an opportunity of it and you must have a plan B,” it said. Additional solicitor normal Maninder Singh said the authority was once no longer sparing any unlawful construction and the ones mentioned by way of the court would be demolished soon. He said the anti-encroachment pressure may just no longer be initiated around the city at one pass and it would be accomplished in levels. He assured the bench that suitable motion would be taken to remove the encroachments.
The bench additionally ticked off DDA for hurriedly amending the master plan to give protection to the passion of buyers who had been dealing with the warmth for sporting out industrial activities from residential premises. The court famous that DDA had given just three days’ understand to folks to report their objections to the proposed amendments. “For each and every affidavit, you seek at least four weeks’ time and even then you definitely fail to report a response in court. How can you say that strange folks be given just three days’ time whilst you seek a month’s time to report a response? There can't be different requirements for the typical man and the federal government authority,” the bench said.
DDA contended that the master plan had to be amended to accommodate an ever-growing inhabitants and it allowed combined land use to make sure folks accessed industrial job in proximity to the place they lived. It said the court’s issues regarding the affect of amendments on the surroundings and infrastructure of the town were examined in detail and there was once no illegality. The court is inspecting the validity of the Delhi Laws (Special Provisions) Act handed in 2006 to give protection to unlawful buildings and misuse of residential premises for industrial purposes. Though the legislation was once framed to provide twelve months of amnesty, the Centre has again and again prolonged the closing date via legislation, the final being in December, to give protection to unlawful buildings till 2020.
Why are rich being spared, SC asks DDA
![Why are rich being spared, SC asks DDA]()
Reviewed by Kailash
on
May 04, 2018
Rating:
