NEW DELHI: As the Supreme Court (SC) is more likely to pronounce its verdict on pleas difficult the validity of Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) on Thursday, here is an explainer on what it way.
* Section 377 of the IPC refers to 'unnatural offences' and says whoever voluntarily has carnal sex against the order of nature with any man, woman or animal, shall be punished with imprisonment for existence, or with imprisonment of both description for a term which may extend to 10 years, and shall even be liable to pay a wonderful.
* The segment came into drive in 1861 during the British rule of India (modelled on the Buggery Act of 1533) which criminalised sexual actions "against the order of nature", together with gay actions.
* It says - 'Whoever voluntarily has carnal sex against the order of nature with any man, woman or animal, shall be punished with imprisonment for existence, or with imprisonment of both description for a term which may extend to 10 years, and shall even be liable to wonderful.'
* The factor of Section 377 used to be first raised via an NGO, Naaz Foundation, and AIDS Bedhbhav Virodh Andolan, within the Delhi top court docket in 2001. Both the petitions have been disregarded within the court docket.
* Eight years later, the Delhi HC decriminalised intercourse between consenting adults of the same gender via keeping the penal provision "illegal".
* However, the 2009 judgement of the top court docket used to be overturned in 2013 via the Supreme Court which had also disregarded a evaluate plea.
* The LGBT group were given hope in 2014 when the SC directed the government to declare transgender a 'third gender' and come with them within the OBC quota.
* On August 24, 2017, the SC had upheld the Right to Privacy as a fundamental right below the Constitution. The SC also had known as for equality and condemned discrimination, stating that the safety of sexual orientation lies at the core of the fundamental rights and that the rights of the LGBT population are actual and based on constitutional doctrine.
* In January 2018, a three-member SC bench heard a petition filed via 5 other people asking the apex court docket to revisit the Naaz Foundation judgement. The case used to be referred to a larger bench and lend a hand used to be sought from the Centre also.
* The apex court docket on July 17 reserved its verdict on whether to decriminalise Section 377 or no longer. The SC will make a decision whether the segment criminalising consensual gay intercourse is valid or no longer on Thursday.
* Gender rights activists have argued that Section 377 violates different articles of the Indian Constitution — Article 14 making certain equality before law to all individuals; Article 15 ensuring that no one is discriminated against on the foundation of caste, gender, creed etc; and Article 21 ensuring the best of existence and liberty to all the electorate of the country.
* Section 377 of the IPC refers to 'unnatural offences' and says whoever voluntarily has carnal sex against the order of nature with any man, woman or animal, shall be punished with imprisonment for existence, or with imprisonment of both description for a term which may extend to 10 years, and shall even be liable to pay a wonderful.
* The segment came into drive in 1861 during the British rule of India (modelled on the Buggery Act of 1533) which criminalised sexual actions "against the order of nature", together with gay actions.
* It says - 'Whoever voluntarily has carnal sex against the order of nature with any man, woman or animal, shall be punished with imprisonment for existence, or with imprisonment of both description for a term which may extend to 10 years, and shall even be liable to wonderful.'
* The factor of Section 377 used to be first raised via an NGO, Naaz Foundation, and AIDS Bedhbhav Virodh Andolan, within the Delhi top court docket in 2001. Both the petitions have been disregarded within the court docket.
* Eight years later, the Delhi HC decriminalised intercourse between consenting adults of the same gender via keeping the penal provision "illegal".
* However, the 2009 judgement of the top court docket used to be overturned in 2013 via the Supreme Court which had also disregarded a evaluate plea.
* The LGBT group were given hope in 2014 when the SC directed the government to declare transgender a 'third gender' and come with them within the OBC quota.
* On August 24, 2017, the SC had upheld the Right to Privacy as a fundamental right below the Constitution. The SC also had known as for equality and condemned discrimination, stating that the safety of sexual orientation lies at the core of the fundamental rights and that the rights of the LGBT population are actual and based on constitutional doctrine.
* In January 2018, a three-member SC bench heard a petition filed via 5 other people asking the apex court docket to revisit the Naaz Foundation judgement. The case used to be referred to a larger bench and lend a hand used to be sought from the Centre also.
* The apex court docket on July 17 reserved its verdict on whether to decriminalise Section 377 or no longer. The SC will make a decision whether the segment criminalising consensual gay intercourse is valid or no longer on Thursday.
* Gender rights activists have argued that Section 377 violates different articles of the Indian Constitution — Article 14 making certain equality before law to all individuals; Article 15 ensuring that no one is discriminated against on the foundation of caste, gender, creed etc; and Article 21 ensuring the best of existence and liberty to all the electorate of the country.
SC verdict on Section 377: All you need to know
![SC verdict on Section 377: All you need to know]()
Reviewed by Kailash
on
September 06, 2018
Rating:
