MUMBAI: Sixteen years after a Mumbai University peon used to be accused of tampering with SYBSc marksheets to lend a hand three scholars go assessments, a tribulation court this month discovered him accountable of forgery and sentenced him to 6 months rigorous imprisonment.
In the primary instance, the accused Mangesh Padelkar (51) changed marks from 21 to 41, whilst in the second one case he changed marks from 18 to 35 and, within the third case, from 20 to 40. All papers have been out of 100.
Two of the scholars deposed but grew to become adversarial. The court noticed this used to be completed both because they have been “received over by means of the accused or they did not wish to incriminate themselves.” The court said their contact with the accused and making inquiries about the result used to be sufficient to turn a nexus.
The court also considered the written confession the accused had given to the college when the inquiry used to be first arrange. The court refused to grant leniency after the defence pleaded that he will have to handiest be sentenced until the rising of the court.
“The accused no longer handiest committed the crime, but also maligned the pious institution of schooling that too when he used to be appointed by means of the government with faith and trust. Thus, he betrays the trust of workplace,” the court said.
The forgery used to be first spotted by means of a clerk within the exam division in 2001. She knowledgeable some other clerk, who then verified the mark listing with the unique papers and located a distinction within the marks. On December 11, 2001, this used to be brought to the notice of a senior member within the division, the primary informant within the case.
He, in flip, directed the vice-chancellor to habits an inquiry and prompt other body of workers contributors to collect knowledge at the factor. Afraid of the results, the accused confessed and begged for pardon.
The assistant vice-chancellor told the informant the accused had given a written confession admitting he made the alterations.
The staffers before whom the accused had confessed deposed as key prosecution witnesses. The court held there used to be no proof to make stronger the version of the accused that he used to be being falsely implicated due to his caste.
In the primary instance, the accused Mangesh Padelkar (51) changed marks from 21 to 41, whilst in the second one case he changed marks from 18 to 35 and, within the third case, from 20 to 40. All papers have been out of 100.
Two of the scholars deposed but grew to become adversarial. The court noticed this used to be completed both because they have been “received over by means of the accused or they did not wish to incriminate themselves.” The court said their contact with the accused and making inquiries about the result used to be sufficient to turn a nexus.
The court also considered the written confession the accused had given to the college when the inquiry used to be first arrange. The court refused to grant leniency after the defence pleaded that he will have to handiest be sentenced until the rising of the court.
“The accused no longer handiest committed the crime, but also maligned the pious institution of schooling that too when he used to be appointed by means of the government with faith and trust. Thus, he betrays the trust of workplace,” the court said.
The forgery used to be first spotted by means of a clerk within the exam division in 2001. She knowledgeable some other clerk, who then verified the mark listing with the unique papers and located a distinction within the marks. On December 11, 2001, this used to be brought to the notice of a senior member within the division, the primary informant within the case.
He, in flip, directed the vice-chancellor to habits an inquiry and prompt other body of workers contributors to collect knowledge at the factor. Afraid of the results, the accused confessed and begged for pardon.
The assistant vice-chancellor told the informant the accused had given a written confession admitting he made the alterations.
The staffers before whom the accused had confessed deposed as key prosecution witnesses. The court held there used to be no proof to make stronger the version of the accused that he used to be being falsely implicated due to his caste.
16 yrs on, MU peon convicted for fudging marks
![16 yrs on, MU peon convicted for fudging marks]()
Reviewed by Kailash
on
April 16, 2019
Rating:
