KOLKATA: Calcutta High Court on Wednesday got here down closely at the government for not complying with an order handed nearly 28 years in the past, directing it to pay a state armed police (SAP) constable his dues. State home secretary Atri Bhattacharyya used to be directed to be in my view present in court when the division bench of Justice Debashis Kargupta and Justice Shampa Sarkar chastised the government for loss of work culture.
Petitioner Habibur Rahaman joined the SAP in June 1981and used to be suspended in 1982 at the charge of suppressing a legal case pending against him. In 1990, Rahaman moved the HC bench of Justice Ajit Sengupta against the suspension order. Justice Sengupta set aside the suspension order and directed the state to pay Rahaman all his arrears from 1982 to 1990 within 4 weeks. The constable used to be reinstated, however his arrears weren’t paid.
“My shopper retired on February 28 this yr. He is in unhealthy form, physically and financially. He used to be granted no promotion in 28 years. He additionally spent most of his financial savings in combating the case,” Rahaman’s suggest Pronob Kumar Ghosh said.
The bench on Wednesday, within the presence of Bhattacharyya, demanded to understand from the state advocate-general concerning the work culture within the state when certainly one of its staff had not been paid arrears in spite of court orders. The bench expressed displeasure when the AG submitted Rahaman used to be paid the dues, however it might take time to trace the paperwork. “The state department had time since 1990. Yet, it selected to disobey the orders of the easiest court within the state. Now, if the information aren't to be had or can’t be traced, one of the most staff of the state won't ever get his dues. Is this not a defeat for the state home department?” the bench said. The court granted the state until August 13 to get a hold of the information relating the subject.
Petitioner Habibur Rahaman joined the SAP in June 1981and used to be suspended in 1982 at the charge of suppressing a legal case pending against him. In 1990, Rahaman moved the HC bench of Justice Ajit Sengupta against the suspension order. Justice Sengupta set aside the suspension order and directed the state to pay Rahaman all his arrears from 1982 to 1990 within 4 weeks. The constable used to be reinstated, however his arrears weren’t paid.
“My shopper retired on February 28 this yr. He is in unhealthy form, physically and financially. He used to be granted no promotion in 28 years. He additionally spent most of his financial savings in combating the case,” Rahaman’s suggest Pronob Kumar Ghosh said.
The bench on Wednesday, within the presence of Bhattacharyya, demanded to understand from the state advocate-general concerning the work culture within the state when certainly one of its staff had not been paid arrears in spite of court orders. The bench expressed displeasure when the AG submitted Rahaman used to be paid the dues, however it might take time to trace the paperwork. “The state department had time since 1990. Yet, it selected to disobey the orders of the easiest court within the state. Now, if the information aren't to be had or can’t be traced, one of the most staff of the state won't ever get his dues. Is this not a defeat for the state home department?” the bench said. The court granted the state until August 13 to get a hold of the information relating the subject.
Home secretary appears in HC in 28-yr-old case
![Home secretary appears in HC in 28-yr-old case]()
Reviewed by Kailash
on
June 08, 2018
Rating:
