A landlord who got into a battle with a tenant over an electricity invoice that used to be Rs 117 more than the common per 30 days fee ended up having to shell out Rs 1 lakh to stay out of jail and face the ignominy of a case below the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO ) Act.
The 34-year-old landlord is from Baiyappanahalli and the grievance used to be filed by a girl who's his tenant. She had gained an electricity invoice of Rs 317 which used to be higher than her same old per 30 days invoice of about Rs 200. She questioned the landlord about it which ended up as a battle between the two.
The girl alleged that he pulled her chudidar and tried to molest her for questioning the invoice. When her daughter intervened, the man allegedly pulled her T-shirt and assaulted her with aniron rod.
Indian Penal Code . Later, fees below the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act have been additionally added.
The accused approached the High Court after being arrested in the case. The HC noted that there's no allegation of sexual assault on a minor for the POCSO Act to be invoked. “The grievance does now not divulge any sexual assault either at the complainant or on her minor daughter. The wound certificates on the subject of the daughter of the complainant indicate that she used to be subjected to the scientific examination simplest on 16.04.2018 even though the offence is alleged to have taken place on 13.04.2018,” the HC noted.
The courtroom additionally identified that the injuries weren't recent. “Even with reference to the injuries, it's noted that she has sustained the following accidents; 1. Abrasion over her back. 2. Abrasion over her left arm, scab dried up. three. Multiple small abrasions over her proper facet of nose. 4. Tenderness over left partial region of head”. The very studying of this wound certificates indicate that not one of the accidents have been recent in nature. There is not any wound certificates on the subject of the injuries alleged to have been suffered by the complainant.”
The HC concluded that the complainant used to be a result of the incident associated with the electricity invoice. “Therefore, at the face of it, the case appears to have been filed towards the petitioner solely on account of the alleged incident, which came about on account of inflated invoice gained by the tenant/complainant.”
The HC ordered the landlord to be released on bail on a bond of Rs 1 lakh and a surety for an identical quantity.
The 34-year-old landlord is from Baiyappanahalli and the grievance used to be filed by a girl who's his tenant. She had gained an electricity invoice of Rs 317 which used to be higher than her same old per 30 days invoice of about Rs 200. She questioned the landlord about it which ended up as a battle between the two.
The girl alleged that he pulled her chudidar and tried to molest her for questioning the invoice. When her daughter intervened, the man allegedly pulled her T-shirt and assaulted her with an
The Baiyappanahalli police registered an FIR charging him with outraging the modesty of a girl, voluntarily inflicting harm and intentional insult below the
The accused approached the High Court after being arrested in the case. The HC noted that there's no allegation of sexual assault on a minor for the POCSO Act to be invoked. “The grievance does now not divulge any sexual assault either at the complainant or on her minor daughter. The wound certificates on the subject of the daughter of the complainant indicate that she used to be subjected to the scientific examination simplest on 16.04.2018 even though the offence is alleged to have taken place on 13.04.2018,” the HC noted.
The courtroom additionally identified that the injuries weren't recent. “Even with reference to the injuries, it's noted that she has sustained the following accidents; 1. Abrasion over her back. 2. Abrasion over her left arm, scab dried up. three. Multiple small abrasions over her proper facet of nose. 4. Tenderness over left partial region of head”. The very studying of this wound certificates indicate that not one of the accidents have been recent in nature. There is not any wound certificates on the subject of the injuries alleged to have been suffered by the complainant.”
The HC concluded that the complainant used to be a result of the incident associated with the electricity invoice. “Therefore, at the face of it, the case appears to have been filed towards the petitioner solely on account of the alleged incident, which came about on account of inflated invoice gained by the tenant/complainant.”
The HC ordered the landlord to be released on bail on a bond of Rs 1 lakh and a surety for an identical quantity.
Fight over power bill ends up in case under POCSO
![Fight over power bill ends up in case under POCSO]()
Reviewed by Kailash
on
July 14, 2018
Rating:
