Hyderabad: The Telangana High Court on Tuesday directed the state government and the Board of Intermediate Education to supply a concrete timeline for the re-evalutation of the answer sheets of the three lakh students who were declared failed through the authorities this yr through April 29.
The bench of performing Chief Justice Raghavendra Singh Chauhan and Justice A Rajasheker Reddy passed this intervening time route while listening to an pressing plea moved through P Achyuta Rao of Balala Hakkula Sangham charging the authorities with enjoying havoc with the lives of the children with their negligent tactics. The bench rejected outrightly the competition of the state that it wishes two months time to reconsider the failed applicants’ papers. “When it's essential assessment the papers of 10 lakh students inside of one month, why do you need two months to reconsider 3 lakh of them? Can’t you do it in 10 days?”, it asked.
Petitioner’s counsel C Damodar Reddy advised the court docket that because of negligence of the officers who released the Intermediate ends up in a moved quickly method, a minimum of 16 students dedicated suicide and ratings of others slipped into depression. As many as 50,000 students were adversely affected as a result of the inaccurate methods of the authorities, he mentioned.
Additional suggest common J Ramachandra Rao informed the court docket that the state has constituted an mavens committee to look the place issues went unsuitable. Failed applicants can apply for second look, he advised the court docket.
Don’t find faults, set issues right, says HC
This yr 9.7 lakh students gave the impression for the Intermediate exams of which 3 lakh students were declared failed, Ramachandra Rao mentioned, maintaining that the failure share has been the similar 30 like yearly. The bench questioned why innocent students be asked to use for second look once more when the state itself is admitting that there have been lapses at the a part of its officers.
The petitioner’s counsel sought a judicial probe into the matter since the state itself was once admitting to lapses and constituted a committee. The bench, on the other hand, made it clear to both the state and the petitioner that the need of the hour is to set issues right and now not find fault with individuals.
As both the state training secretary and the Intermediate Board secretary were provide prior to the court docket, it without delay interacted with them. It brushed aside their apprehensions that they would possibly not have the ability to reconsider all of the papers in an instant in view of the need to habits supplementary examinations. “If you have got the need, you'll be able to for sure reconsider all of the papers of the failed applicants inside of a short span of time,” the bench mentioned and posted the case to April 29 for perusing the counters to be filed through the state and the Intermediate Board through that point. Both the secretaries were asked to be provide on that day too.
The bench also tore into the board and government’s assurance of motion, declaring that for the reason that state had outsourced the activity of evaluation, it is going to handiest glance into the lapses of that non-public agency, like whether or not the questions and solutions were framed correctly and whether or not the important thing was once framed correctly and whether or not the device functioned appropriately etc. But the committee has no mandate to check how such massive lapses happened and take remedial steps in an instant, the bench mentioned.
The bench of performing Chief Justice Raghavendra Singh Chauhan and Justice A Rajasheker Reddy passed this intervening time route while listening to an pressing plea moved through P Achyuta Rao of Balala Hakkula Sangham charging the authorities with enjoying havoc with the lives of the children with their negligent tactics. The bench rejected outrightly the competition of the state that it wishes two months time to reconsider the failed applicants’ papers. “When it's essential assessment the papers of 10 lakh students inside of one month, why do you need two months to reconsider 3 lakh of them? Can’t you do it in 10 days?”, it asked.
Petitioner’s counsel C Damodar Reddy advised the court docket that because of negligence of the officers who released the Intermediate ends up in a moved quickly method, a minimum of 16 students dedicated suicide and ratings of others slipped into depression. As many as 50,000 students were adversely affected as a result of the inaccurate methods of the authorities, he mentioned.
Additional suggest common J Ramachandra Rao informed the court docket that the state has constituted an mavens committee to look the place issues went unsuitable. Failed applicants can apply for second look, he advised the court docket.
Don’t find faults, set issues right, says HC
This yr 9.7 lakh students gave the impression for the Intermediate exams of which 3 lakh students were declared failed, Ramachandra Rao mentioned, maintaining that the failure share has been the similar 30 like yearly. The bench questioned why innocent students be asked to use for second look once more when the state itself is admitting that there have been lapses at the a part of its officers.
The petitioner’s counsel sought a judicial probe into the matter since the state itself was once admitting to lapses and constituted a committee. The bench, on the other hand, made it clear to both the state and the petitioner that the need of the hour is to set issues right and now not find fault with individuals.
As both the state training secretary and the Intermediate Board secretary were provide prior to the court docket, it without delay interacted with them. It brushed aside their apprehensions that they would possibly not have the ability to reconsider all of the papers in an instant in view of the need to habits supplementary examinations. “If you have got the need, you'll be able to for sure reconsider all of the papers of the failed applicants inside of a short span of time,” the bench mentioned and posted the case to April 29 for perusing the counters to be filed through the state and the Intermediate Board through that point. Both the secretaries were asked to be provide on that day too.
The bench also tore into the board and government’s assurance of motion, declaring that for the reason that state had outsourced the activity of evaluation, it is going to handiest glance into the lapses of that non-public agency, like whether or not the questions and solutions were framed correctly and whether or not the important thing was once framed correctly and whether or not the device functioned appropriately etc. But the committee has no mandate to check how such massive lapses happened and take remedial steps in an instant, the bench mentioned.
HC seeks timeline for paper re-evalutation
![HC seeks timeline for paper re-evalutation]()
Reviewed by Kailash
on
April 24, 2019
Rating:
