COIMBATORE: More than 3,000 advocates boycotted courts here on Wednesday to protest in opposition to a circular issued by the Madras high courtroom. The circular requested advocated to attach their identification evidence and every other legal professional's identification evidence, who attests their shopper's petition, when it's submitted to the courtroom.
The advocates introduced an indefinite strike. But after the high courtroom stayed the order, the advocates mentioned they'd hold a meeting on Thursday and then make a decision on chickening out the strike.
"We usually attach a letter with the petitions when submitted to the court. In November last, the Madras high court issued a circular asking us to attach our photographs along with our enrollment IDs. We had opposed it as we could not carry so many photographs every day and it would not resolve the unqualified lawyer menace," mentioned an recommend in the town.
He added that after opposition from all advocates, the high courtroom issued every other order on December 30, asking them to attach a letter with their identification evidence and likewise connect every other letter from every other legal professional testifying it with his or her evidence as well.
"Asking someone else to attest our petition is itself a burden for another lawyer. But asking to attach his identity proof cannot be accepted," mentioned an recommend. He added that this might no longer lend a hand in resolving any factor.
"Most of the unqualified advocates function outside the courts and they use in house lawyers for their job. Very rarely they enter the courts or argue in a case. Asking advocates to attach their identity proofs even for attestations is an unnecessary procedure. Instead, technology should be used to remove unqualified advocates. We are giving our enrollment number along with the petitions. Those should be used for verification," mentioned a town based totally recommend.
The advocates mentioned the problem of unqualified lawyers was once bigger and other measures should be brought in to tackle it.
The advocates introduced an indefinite strike. But after the high courtroom stayed the order, the advocates mentioned they'd hold a meeting on Thursday and then make a decision on chickening out the strike.
"We usually attach a letter with the petitions when submitted to the court. In November last, the Madras high court issued a circular asking us to attach our photographs along with our enrollment IDs. We had opposed it as we could not carry so many photographs every day and it would not resolve the unqualified lawyer menace," mentioned an recommend in the town.
He added that after opposition from all advocates, the high courtroom issued every other order on December 30, asking them to attach a letter with their identification evidence and likewise connect every other letter from every other legal professional testifying it with his or her evidence as well.
"Asking someone else to attest our petition is itself a burden for another lawyer. But asking to attach his identity proof cannot be accepted," mentioned an recommend. He added that this might no longer lend a hand in resolving any factor.
"Most of the unqualified advocates function outside the courts and they use in house lawyers for their job. Very rarely they enter the courts or argue in a case. Asking advocates to attach their identity proofs even for attestations is an unnecessary procedure. Instead, technology should be used to remove unqualified advocates. We are giving our enrollment number along with the petitions. Those should be used for verification," mentioned a town based totally recommend.
The advocates mentioned the problem of unqualified lawyers was once bigger and other measures should be brought in to tackle it.
Coimbatore advocates boycott courts
![Coimbatore advocates boycott courts]()
Reviewed by Kailash
on
January 03, 2018
Rating:
