India frittered away a very good likelihood to wrap up the T20I collection towards South Africa on Wednesday, letting Heinrich Klaasen and Co. run away with the sport regardless of posing a challenging overall of 188/4.
ALSO READ: I rather fancy Chahal's bowling: Klaasen
It’s rather imaginable that the staff control, after the loss, would have looked on the resolution to play Yuzvendra Chahal at Centurion while rain was once across the corner as a major lapse in judgment. As it became out, it proved to be a poor choice, probably the most key reasons why India lost.
It had rained for most a part of the day in Centurion on Wednesday, resulting in the abandonment of the India-SA girls’s T20I halfway during the recreation earlier in the day. More rain was once predicted for the night time, and because it transpired, a sizable duration of the sport was once played below a superb drizzle.
ALSO READ: Yadav-Chahal key to India's luck in out of the country conditions: Tendulkar
Just a couple of days again, in the fourth ODI on the Wanderers in what was once any other rain-hit tie, Chahal have been taken to the cleaners by Klaasen. Then too, India needed to bowl 2nd after a rain interruption and Chahal and Kuldeep Yadav, the 2 spinners who had tied the Proteas up in knots in the ODI collection till then, changed into completely useless. Chahal was once brutally dealt with and returned figures of five.Three-0-68-1 as the hosts controlled their solitary luck in the ODI collection.
All bowlers face problems while bowling with a rainy ball, but extra so wrist spinners. Their keep an eye on goes awry and the ball doesn’t grip the skin, which negates their spin.
Thus, enjoying Chahal was once a dangerous move. The staff may have played left-arm spinner Axar Patel who has an impressive limited-overs document and who would have offered a different challenge to the South Africans, chiefly Klaasen. Being a finger spinner, Patel would have controlled the ball better in rainy conditions or even fired in yorker-length quicker ones on the pads to keep an eye on the run deluge. It’s highly not going that Patel would have conceded as many as 64 in four overs which Chahal did.
Also, India more than likely erred by giving Chahal his complete quota of overs and not trying any individual like part-timer Suresh Raina, who has bowled rather quite a lot of overs in limited-overs cricket. The move would possibly not have labored but it was once price a check out.
ALSO READ: I rather fancy Chahal's bowling: Klaasen
It’s rather imaginable that the staff control, after the loss, would have looked on the resolution to play Yuzvendra Chahal at Centurion while rain was once across the corner as a major lapse in judgment. As it became out, it proved to be a poor choice, probably the most key reasons why India lost.
It had rained for most a part of the day in Centurion on Wednesday, resulting in the abandonment of the India-SA girls’s T20I halfway during the recreation earlier in the day. More rain was once predicted for the night time, and because it transpired, a sizable duration of the sport was once played below a superb drizzle.
ALSO READ: Yadav-Chahal key to India's luck in out of the country conditions: Tendulkar
Just a couple of days again, in the fourth ODI on the Wanderers in what was once any other rain-hit tie, Chahal have been taken to the cleaners by Klaasen. Then too, India needed to bowl 2nd after a rain interruption and Chahal and Kuldeep Yadav, the 2 spinners who had tied the Proteas up in knots in the ODI collection till then, changed into completely useless. Chahal was once brutally dealt with and returned figures of five.Three-0-68-1 as the hosts controlled their solitary luck in the ODI collection.
All bowlers face problems while bowling with a rainy ball, but extra so wrist spinners. Their keep an eye on goes awry and the ball doesn’t grip the skin, which negates their spin.
Thus, enjoying Chahal was once a dangerous move. The staff may have played left-arm spinner Axar Patel who has an impressive limited-overs document and who would have offered a different challenge to the South Africans, chiefly Klaasen. Being a finger spinner, Patel would have controlled the ball better in rainy conditions or even fired in yorker-length quicker ones on the pads to keep an eye on the run deluge. It’s highly not going that Patel would have conceded as many as 64 in four overs which Chahal did.
Also, India more than likely erred by giving Chahal his complete quota of overs and not trying any individual like part-timer Suresh Raina, who has bowled rather quite a lot of overs in limited-overs cricket. The move would possibly not have labored but it was once price a check out.
Did playing Chahal at rainy Centurion cost India the game?
![Did playing Chahal at rainy Centurion cost India the game?]()
Reviewed by Kailash
on
February 23, 2018
Rating:
