NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court lately rejected a bail plea of a juvenile, accused of killing a seven-year-old boy in a non-public school in Gurugram.
A bench of Justices R F Nariman and Indu Malhotra rejected the plea which sought default bail on the ground that price sheet used to be now not filed inside of 60 days.
The bench said this can be a heinous offence underneath segment 302 of IPC and the cut-off date for filing the price sheet used to be 90 days and now not 60 days.
The Punjab and Haryana High Court had on June 6 brushed aside the bail plea of the 16-year-old student, accused of killing a seven-year-old boy in a non-public school in Gurugram in September ultimate yr.
The top court had additionally rejected the accused's submission that he deserved the advantage of statutory bail on the ground that the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) had didn't conclude its probe within the prescribed restrict of 60 days.
The accused had challenged within the top court the February five order of a Gurugram classes court which had rejected his plea saying that the degree used to be now not have compatibility for granting bail.
On May 21, the classes court had held that the 16-year-old student can be attempted as an grownup within the homicide case.
Upholding the verdict of the Juvenile Justice Board (JJB), the court had said the juvenile board took into consideration all of the subject material placed earlier than it to establish "the physical and mental capacity (of the accused) to commit the crime" and there used to be no need for any intervention.
The accused had challenged the December 20 order of the JJB, which had held that the teenager can be attempted as an grownup.
The CBI, in its price sheet, had alleged that the teenager had murdered the scholar on September eight ultimate yr in a bid to get tests postponed and a scheduled parent-teacher assembly cancelled.
The victim's body, with the throat slit, used to be discovered within the washroom of the varsity on the Bhondsi house of Gurugram.
Earlier, the court had barred the media from the use of the title of the victim, the accused and the varsity and requested it to use fictitious names as a substitute.
While the victim used to be named "Prince" by the court, the accused used to be named "Bholu" and the varsity used to be known as "vidyalaya".
The probe agency had given a clean chit to school bus conductor Ashok Kumar, who used to be arrested by the Gurugram Police, saying there used to be no proof to end up his involvement within the crime.
The CBI had taken up the case from the Gurugram Police on September 22, following a national uproar over the killing.
A bench of Justices R F Nariman and Indu Malhotra rejected the plea which sought default bail on the ground that price sheet used to be now not filed inside of 60 days.
The bench said this can be a heinous offence underneath segment 302 of IPC and the cut-off date for filing the price sheet used to be 90 days and now not 60 days.
The Punjab and Haryana High Court had on June 6 brushed aside the bail plea of the 16-year-old student, accused of killing a seven-year-old boy in a non-public school in Gurugram in September ultimate yr.
The top court had additionally rejected the accused's submission that he deserved the advantage of statutory bail on the ground that the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) had didn't conclude its probe within the prescribed restrict of 60 days.
The accused had challenged within the top court the February five order of a Gurugram classes court which had rejected his plea saying that the degree used to be now not have compatibility for granting bail.
On May 21, the classes court had held that the 16-year-old student can be attempted as an grownup within the homicide case.
Upholding the verdict of the Juvenile Justice Board (JJB), the court had said the juvenile board took into consideration all of the subject material placed earlier than it to establish "the physical and mental capacity (of the accused) to commit the crime" and there used to be no need for any intervention.
The accused had challenged the December 20 order of the JJB, which had held that the teenager can be attempted as an grownup.
The CBI, in its price sheet, had alleged that the teenager had murdered the scholar on September eight ultimate yr in a bid to get tests postponed and a scheduled parent-teacher assembly cancelled.
The victim's body, with the throat slit, used to be discovered within the washroom of the varsity on the Bhondsi house of Gurugram.
Earlier, the court had barred the media from the use of the title of the victim, the accused and the varsity and requested it to use fictitious names as a substitute.
While the victim used to be named "Prince" by the court, the accused used to be named "Bholu" and the varsity used to be known as "vidyalaya".
The probe agency had given a clean chit to school bus conductor Ashok Kumar, who used to be arrested by the Gurugram Police, saying there used to be no proof to end up his involvement within the crime.
The CBI had taken up the case from the Gurugram Police on September 22, following a national uproar over the killing.
Gurugram school boy killing: SC rejects bail plea of juvenile accused
![Gurugram school boy killing: SC rejects bail plea of juvenile accused]()
Reviewed by Kailash
on
July 20, 2018
Rating:
