This is to deliver in your consideration that TOI report headlined ‘CBI feud: NGO that opposed Verma’s selection now backs him’ is factually unsuitable and deceptive.
The report claims that “The wheel of time turned complete circle for NGO ‘Common Cause’ when it moved the Supreme Court on Thursday difficult the Centre’s “arbitrary” resolution to divest CBI leader Alok Verma of his powers.” It went on to add that: “As it happens, the organisation founded through H D Shourie had unsuccessfully challenged Verma’s appointment in January 2017 alleging that procedures were not followed in his selection as leader of the rustic’s premier investigating company.”
In fact, Common Cause never opposed the present CBI director Alok Kumar Verma’s appointment on any flooring. There used to be no question of being unsuccessful once we never challenged the appointment. This can very easily be verified from felony data and the copies of the petitions available at the Common Cause website online.
Common Cause had simplest opposed the appointment of an intervening time director, because it used to be very clear that the outgoing director Anil Sinha used to be going to demit the administrative center of CBI director on December 2, 2016, at the finish of his fixed tenure of 2 years as required beneath regulation.
In fact, Common Cause had filed a PIL within the Supreme Court [W.P. (C) 984/2016] in December 2016, praying for issuance of a suitable writ directing the federal government to appoint an ordinary director of CBI. It prayed that an ordinary director be appointed as in keeping with procedures established through regulation and in keeping with the landmark judgment within the Vineet Narain case.
Common Cause at no level had any fear whether Alok Verma or somebody else succeeded Sinha as director of this premier investigation company.
Our PIL used to be in keeping with maintaining the institutional integrity of the rustic’s premier investigation company. With the appointment of Verma as the new CBI director, submit approval through the next selection committee meeting, the Supreme Court closed the petition on January 20, 2017.
The Common Cause petition also prayed for quashing the appointment of the intervening time/performing director, declaring that despite the fact that the federal government used to be absolutely aware that Anil Sinha used to be demitting administrative center on a fixed date, it did not convene a gathering of the selection committee to appoint the new director.
The Common Cause petition elaborated that so as to safeguard the independence of the CBI, a detailed procedure has been laid down in Section 4A of the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946, as amended through the Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act, 2013. The government chose to ignore the mechanism it appears thru a chain of omissions and commissions.
The fact is that Common Cause did not challenge Verma’s appointment prior to now, and is not ‘backing’ him now. The petition difficult his arbitrary removal is to be sure that due procedure is followed and there is evenhandedness within the remedy of both officers in question.
TOI’s Dhananjay Mahapatra responds
I stand through my report. Let me quote from a TOI report dated Jan 20, 2018 and headlined “SC refuses to inspect selection procedure for appointing Verma as CBI director”: “Advocate Prashant Bhushan, showing for NGO which had sought court’s course for delay in appointing CBI leader, then pleaded the court to direct the federal government to position minutes of the meeting so that selection procedure may well be examined. He stated that as in keeping with media reports Verma used to be no longer selected unanimously and there used to be dissent opinion through one member of the committee. He stated court must ask for minutes of the meeting.”
It is apparent that , opposite in your declare that Common Cause did not oppose Alok Verma’s appointment on “ any flooring”, it did oppose his selection as the CBI leader on media reports a few dissent through one of the vital participants of selection committee meeting.
The report claims that “The wheel of time turned complete circle for NGO ‘Common Cause’ when it moved the Supreme Court on Thursday difficult the Centre’s “arbitrary” resolution to divest CBI leader Alok Verma of his powers.” It went on to add that: “As it happens, the organisation founded through H D Shourie had unsuccessfully challenged Verma’s appointment in January 2017 alleging that procedures were not followed in his selection as leader of the rustic’s premier investigating company.”
In fact, Common Cause never opposed the present CBI director Alok Kumar Verma’s appointment on any flooring. There used to be no question of being unsuccessful once we never challenged the appointment. This can very easily be verified from felony data and the copies of the petitions available at the Common Cause website online.
Common Cause had simplest opposed the appointment of an intervening time director, because it used to be very clear that the outgoing director Anil Sinha used to be going to demit the administrative center of CBI director on December 2, 2016, at the finish of his fixed tenure of 2 years as required beneath regulation.
In fact, Common Cause had filed a PIL within the Supreme Court [W.P. (C) 984/2016] in December 2016, praying for issuance of a suitable writ directing the federal government to appoint an ordinary director of CBI. It prayed that an ordinary director be appointed as in keeping with procedures established through regulation and in keeping with the landmark judgment within the Vineet Narain case.
Common Cause at no level had any fear whether Alok Verma or somebody else succeeded Sinha as director of this premier investigation company.
Our PIL used to be in keeping with maintaining the institutional integrity of the rustic’s premier investigation company. With the appointment of Verma as the new CBI director, submit approval through the next selection committee meeting, the Supreme Court closed the petition on January 20, 2017.
The Common Cause petition also prayed for quashing the appointment of the intervening time/performing director, declaring that despite the fact that the federal government used to be absolutely aware that Anil Sinha used to be demitting administrative center on a fixed date, it did not convene a gathering of the selection committee to appoint the new director.
The Common Cause petition elaborated that so as to safeguard the independence of the CBI, a detailed procedure has been laid down in Section 4A of the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946, as amended through the Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act, 2013. The government chose to ignore the mechanism it appears thru a chain of omissions and commissions.
The fact is that Common Cause did not challenge Verma’s appointment prior to now, and is not ‘backing’ him now. The petition difficult his arbitrary removal is to be sure that due procedure is followed and there is evenhandedness within the remedy of both officers in question.
TOI’s Dhananjay Mahapatra responds
I stand through my report. Let me quote from a TOI report dated Jan 20, 2018 and headlined “SC refuses to inspect selection procedure for appointing Verma as CBI director”: “Advocate Prashant Bhushan, showing for NGO which had sought court’s course for delay in appointing CBI leader, then pleaded the court to direct the federal government to position minutes of the meeting so that selection procedure may well be examined. He stated that as in keeping with media reports Verma used to be no longer selected unanimously and there used to be dissent opinion through one member of the committee. He stated court must ask for minutes of the meeting.”
It is apparent that , opposite in your declare that Common Cause did not oppose Alok Verma’s appointment on “ any flooring”, it did oppose his selection as the CBI leader on media reports a few dissent through one of the vital participants of selection committee meeting.
Report on Verma’s selection incorrect: Common Cause
![Report on Verma’s selection incorrect: Common Cause]()
Reviewed by Kailash
on
October 28, 2018
Rating:
