MUMBAI: Eight out of ten other people in Mumbai are not conscious about the Good Samaritan regulation that protects bystanders who come to the rescue of victims of highway crashes, a survey conducted by means of SaveLIFE Foundation has printed.
The survey confirmed 78% respondents within the city had no clue about the regulation which came into impact in 2016. SaveLIFE CEO Piyush Tewari, who was once in Mumbai on Thursday for the Road Safety Week, said the survey printed loss of public campaigns and inadequate awareness at the Good Samaritan regulation to encourage bystander care at the city’s roads.
The most cited reason for no longer coming forward to help crash victims was once worry of police harassment (33% respondents); 28% said serving to a sufferer may just lead to felony hassles, court appearance and so forth; and 10% felt people provide at acrash scene would help.
In 2012, SaveLIFE Foundation had filed a petition in Supreme Court underneath Article 32 of the Constitution for a felony framework for cover of Good Samaritans in highway injuries. “The goal was once to give protection to them from felony and
procedural hassles. Due to worry of harassment by means of police, detention at hospitals and prolonged felony formalities, bystanders are reluctant to come forward to help a sufferer,” Tewari said.
The apex court took a serious view, and the regulation therefore came into impact in March 2016. According to the survey, in Mumbai, 38% of Good Samaritans considering saving victims prior to now few years complained police didn't call an ambulance immediately after achieving the crash web site.
Nearly 33% showed the sufferer was once no longer carried to the closest health center by means of police. The new regulation states that somebody who makes a choice to the police keep watch over room or police station to offer information about any crash need not disclose non-public details. But 57% respondents said police requested non-public details and 62% said they weren't approved to depart the coincidence spot.
Around 95% said clinical execs didn't take non-public details of Samaritans. As many as 91% said the regulation was once no longer displayed at front of hospitals, resulting in lack of awareness. Only 22% respondents in Mumbai were conscious about the regulation and protection presented.
(With inputs from Pradeep Gupta)
The survey confirmed 78% respondents within the city had no clue about the regulation which came into impact in 2016. SaveLIFE CEO Piyush Tewari, who was once in Mumbai on Thursday for the Road Safety Week, said the survey printed loss of public campaigns and inadequate awareness at the Good Samaritan regulation to encourage bystander care at the city’s roads.
The most cited reason for no longer coming forward to help crash victims was once worry of police harassment (33% respondents); 28% said serving to a sufferer may just lead to felony hassles, court appearance and so forth; and 10% felt people provide at acrash scene would help.
In 2012, SaveLIFE Foundation had filed a petition in Supreme Court underneath Article 32 of the Constitution for a felony framework for cover of Good Samaritans in highway injuries. “The goal was once to give protection to them from felony and
procedural hassles. Due to worry of harassment by means of police, detention at hospitals and prolonged felony formalities, bystanders are reluctant to come forward to help a sufferer,” Tewari said.
The apex court took a serious view, and the regulation therefore came into impact in March 2016. According to the survey, in Mumbai, 38% of Good Samaritans considering saving victims prior to now few years complained police didn't call an ambulance immediately after achieving the crash web site.
Nearly 33% showed the sufferer was once no longer carried to the closest health center by means of police. The new regulation states that somebody who makes a choice to the police keep watch over room or police station to offer information about any crash need not disclose non-public details. But 57% respondents said police requested non-public details and 62% said they weren't approved to depart the coincidence spot.
Around 95% said clinical execs didn't take non-public details of Samaritans. As many as 91% said the regulation was once no longer displayed at front of hospitals, resulting in lack of awareness. Only 22% respondents in Mumbai were conscious about the regulation and protection presented.
(With inputs from Pradeep Gupta)
Most people unaware of Good Samaritan law
![Most people unaware of Good Samaritan law]()
Reviewed by Kailash
on
February 08, 2019
Rating:
