AHMEDABAD: Retired Gujarat cops, D G Vanzara and N K Amin, asked the special CBI court on Tuesday to drop prison lawsuits in opposition to them in the 2004 Ishrat Jahan come upon case mentioning that Gujarat govt refused sanction to prosecute them.
After the 2 accused filed programs for losing the lawsuits, the CBI recommend instructed the court to grant him time in order that he may just download instructions from higher authorities.
To this, the accused took objection and submitted that there used to be no want to hear the CBI after the prosecution sanction underneath segment 197 of the CrPC has been declined.
However, special judge J K Pandya granted the CBI time till April 3 to answer Vanzara and Amin’s programs.
Meanwhile, Ishrat’s mother, Shamima Kauser approached the court on Monday and sought a copy of the Gujarat govt’s letter to the CBI refusing it the sanction. She has submitted that earlier than taking any decision on the refusal to prosecute Vanzara and Amin, the court should listen to her.
“In order to forestall a grave miscarriage of justice, the applicant be heard on the issue of refusal of sanction to prosecute,” her utility reads.
Ishrat’s mother mentioned that she has were given a say on this case for the reason that investigation used to be launched on this case by Gujarat prime court on her petition.
On March 19, the CBI placed earlier than the court the letter it won from Gujarat govt refusing to grant permission to prosecute the cops. It cited Vanzara’s absence on crime scene and lack of cause in the crime to conclude that Vanzara cannot be prosecuted. It stated that prosecution cannot be granted in higher public pastime and if prosecution takes place on fees in line with malicious foundation, it would be a malicious and vexatious prosecution.
Sources stated that the state govt, in its letter, criticized the CBI for its investigation and not on time arrests. It cited examples of IPS officer G L Singhal and PI Bharat Patel who have been arrested however launched after chargesheet used to be now not filed in time. Patel used to be now not even charged. The govt claimed that this used to be a clear diversion from standard follow of law.
The state govt has additionally quoted Lahore-based Ghazwa Times, through which Lashkar-e-Taiba claimed that Ishrat Jahan used to be its member.
After the 2 accused filed programs for losing the lawsuits, the CBI recommend instructed the court to grant him time in order that he may just download instructions from higher authorities.
To this, the accused took objection and submitted that there used to be no want to hear the CBI after the prosecution sanction underneath segment 197 of the CrPC has been declined.
However, special judge J K Pandya granted the CBI time till April 3 to answer Vanzara and Amin’s programs.
Meanwhile, Ishrat’s mother, Shamima Kauser approached the court on Monday and sought a copy of the Gujarat govt’s letter to the CBI refusing it the sanction. She has submitted that earlier than taking any decision on the refusal to prosecute Vanzara and Amin, the court should listen to her.
“In order to forestall a grave miscarriage of justice, the applicant be heard on the issue of refusal of sanction to prosecute,” her utility reads.
Ishrat’s mother mentioned that she has were given a say on this case for the reason that investigation used to be launched on this case by Gujarat prime court on her petition.
On March 19, the CBI placed earlier than the court the letter it won from Gujarat govt refusing to grant permission to prosecute the cops. It cited Vanzara’s absence on crime scene and lack of cause in the crime to conclude that Vanzara cannot be prosecuted. It stated that prosecution cannot be granted in higher public pastime and if prosecution takes place on fees in line with malicious foundation, it would be a malicious and vexatious prosecution.
Sources stated that the state govt, in its letter, criticized the CBI for its investigation and not on time arrests. It cited examples of IPS officer G L Singhal and PI Bharat Patel who have been arrested however launched after chargesheet used to be now not filed in time. Patel used to be now not even charged. The govt claimed that this used to be a clear diversion from standard follow of law.
The state govt has additionally quoted Lahore-based Ghazwa Times, through which Lashkar-e-Taiba claimed that Ishrat Jahan used to be its member.
Ishrat case: Vanzara, Amin want case dropped
![Ishrat case: Vanzara, Amin want case dropped]()
Reviewed by Kailash
on
March 27, 2019
Rating:
