Mumbai: A suite of lenders needs the federal government to take over the Nirav Modi and Gitanjali crew of businesses fairly than have banks begin chapter court cases. Banks mentioned a precedent was set on the subject of Satyam Computers, where the federal government appointed a board of administrators to run the corporate and offer protection to its assets.
However, sources in the company affairs ministry mentioned that the federal government was now not occupied with taking up the corporations as this may end result in the Centre being responsible for all liabilities.
Those opposed to insolvency court cases are banks that experience an oblique publicity to the Nirav Modi and Gitanjali fraud via their loans towards unauthorised guarantees issued by way of Punjab National Bank (PNB). A central authority takeover would, therefore, lend a hand in unwinding one of the most liabilities in over Rs 11,300-crore price letters of enterprise (LoUs) fraudulently acquired by way of the 2 teams.
If chapter court cases are initiated, it would mean that the resolution procedure must be finished within 270 days from the date of admission. If there is not any resolution plan, which is very most probably given the fraud, the corporations would have to be liquidated.
Besides, insolvency would also adversely impact over 1,000 staff. Around 700 staff working in Hyderabad Gems SEZ — a 100% subsidiary of Gitanjali — have discovered themselves with no task after the SEZ was connected in the wake of the fraud. Over 250 of the ones staff in the SEZ were other folks with disabilities.
Overall, there are 34 banks with publicity to the 2 teams. The biggest publicity by way of some distance is of PNB via LoUs. Additionally, the bank has sanctioned limits of over Rs 900 crore. Gitanjali and Nirav Modi teams in combination have sanctioned limits of Rs eight,000-9,000 crore.
ICICI Bank, which leads the consortium of banks that experience loans to Gitanjali, is known to be in favour of insolvency court cases. However, the lender has agreed to wait till it will get a record from Delhi-based auditor T R Chadha who has been appointed to behavior a forensic evaluation of the corporate.
PNB has categorised Gitanjali as a non-performing asset (NPA). Several other lenders have now not yet categorised the group as an NPA since, this happens most effective once the fraud is established or after repayment is due for 90 days. Given the character of the case, all loans usually are categorised NPA by way of March 31.
However, sources in the company affairs ministry mentioned that the federal government was now not occupied with taking up the corporations as this may end result in the Centre being responsible for all liabilities.
Those opposed to insolvency court cases are banks that experience an oblique publicity to the Nirav Modi and Gitanjali fraud via their loans towards unauthorised guarantees issued by way of Punjab National Bank (PNB). A central authority takeover would, therefore, lend a hand in unwinding one of the most liabilities in over Rs 11,300-crore price letters of enterprise (LoUs) fraudulently acquired by way of the 2 teams.
If chapter court cases are initiated, it would mean that the resolution procedure must be finished within 270 days from the date of admission. If there is not any resolution plan, which is very most probably given the fraud, the corporations would have to be liquidated.
Besides, insolvency would also adversely impact over 1,000 staff. Around 700 staff working in Hyderabad Gems SEZ — a 100% subsidiary of Gitanjali — have discovered themselves with no task after the SEZ was connected in the wake of the fraud. Over 250 of the ones staff in the SEZ were other folks with disabilities.
Overall, there are 34 banks with publicity to the 2 teams. The biggest publicity by way of some distance is of PNB via LoUs. Additionally, the bank has sanctioned limits of over Rs 900 crore. Gitanjali and Nirav Modi teams in combination have sanctioned limits of Rs eight,000-9,000 crore.
ICICI Bank, which leads the consortium of banks that experience loans to Gitanjali, is known to be in favour of insolvency court cases. However, the lender has agreed to wait till it will get a record from Delhi-based auditor T R Chadha who has been appointed to behavior a forensic evaluation of the corporate.
PNB has categorised Gitanjali as a non-performing asset (NPA). Several other lenders have now not yet categorised the group as an NPA since, this happens most effective once the fraud is established or after repayment is due for 90 days. Given the character of the case, all loans usually are categorised NPA by way of March 31.
Lenders back govt takeover of NiMo & Gitanjali cos
![Lenders back govt takeover of NiMo & Gitanjali cos]()
Reviewed by Kailash
on
February 26, 2018
Rating:
