GURUGRAM: An RTI answer via the training department has published that 24 personal faculties in Gurugram have no longer admitted any scholar below the economically weaker sections (EWS) class prior to now two years for the periods 2016-17 and 2017-18. However, no action has been taken in opposition to these faculties but.
Under Rule 134-A of Haryana School Education Rules, 2003, all personal faculties have to reserve 10% seats below the EWS class.
District training officer Premalata Yadav mentioned, “We do not have any information about faculties that have no longer given admission below the EWS class.
“If we get a list of such faculties, appropriate action will probably be taken in opposition to them. The 2017-19 admissions will probably be supervised more efficiently than admissions in previous years.”
The reply to RTI activist Aseem Takyar’s question names some outstanding faculties that have refused admissions to students belonging to economically weaker sections of society.
All of the 24 faculties had were given land from Huda, in keeping with the RTI answer. Schools built on Huda land have to reserve 20% seats for college kids below the EWS and beneath poverty line (BPL) classes.
However, all the faculties utterly omitted the rule. Huda property officer-II Vivek Kalia mentioned, “This is a sensitive issue and the RTI raises legitimate issues. The faculties which refused admissions below the EWS class must face inquiry.”
He added, “We keep these regulations in thoughts once we allot land for building of colleges. If the training department tells us that some faculties are violating the norms, we will without a doubt take steps in opposition to them. An investigation must be performed to find out which faculties don't seem to be giving admissions below the EWS class they usually must be requested to provide reasons for a similar.”
Takyar mentioned, “Huda has sought replies from the colleges but none of them have answered but. It is obligatory for faculties to put up notice forums within their premises, notifying voters about their right to admissions below the EWS class. However, I have by no means noticed this kind of notice board in town faculties.”
Vaibhav Kapoor, principal of Ajanta Public School, mentioned, “The knowledge won through the RTI is mistaken. We have always given admissions to students below the EWS class.
“These students are given admissions according to BPL and other vital paperwork that their oldsters give us. We have additionally equipped knowledge on this regard to the dept involved regularly. However, a private unaided school isn't certain to percentage any knowledge with a third party, in keeping with high courtroom orders.”
Aditi Mishra, principal of Delhi Public School (DPS), Sector 45, mentioned, “This is false information. We give admission to each kid sent to us via the training department.”
Under Rule 134-A of Haryana School Education Rules, 2003, all personal faculties have to reserve 10% seats below the EWS class.
District training officer Premalata Yadav mentioned, “We do not have any information about faculties that have no longer given admission below the EWS class.
“If we get a list of such faculties, appropriate action will probably be taken in opposition to them. The 2017-19 admissions will probably be supervised more efficiently than admissions in previous years.”
The reply to RTI activist Aseem Takyar’s question names some outstanding faculties that have refused admissions to students belonging to economically weaker sections of society.
All of the 24 faculties had were given land from Huda, in keeping with the RTI answer. Schools built on Huda land have to reserve 20% seats for college kids below the EWS and beneath poverty line (BPL) classes.
However, all the faculties utterly omitted the rule. Huda property officer-II Vivek Kalia mentioned, “This is a sensitive issue and the RTI raises legitimate issues. The faculties which refused admissions below the EWS class must face inquiry.”
He added, “We keep these regulations in thoughts once we allot land for building of colleges. If the training department tells us that some faculties are violating the norms, we will without a doubt take steps in opposition to them. An investigation must be performed to find out which faculties don't seem to be giving admissions below the EWS class they usually must be requested to provide reasons for a similar.”
Takyar mentioned, “Huda has sought replies from the colleges but none of them have answered but. It is obligatory for faculties to put up notice forums within their premises, notifying voters about their right to admissions below the EWS class. However, I have by no means noticed this kind of notice board in town faculties.”
Vaibhav Kapoor, principal of Ajanta Public School, mentioned, “The knowledge won through the RTI is mistaken. We have always given admissions to students below the EWS class.
“These students are given admissions according to BPL and other vital paperwork that their oldsters give us. We have additionally equipped knowledge on this regard to the dept involved regularly. However, a private unaided school isn't certain to percentage any knowledge with a third party, in keeping with high courtroom orders.”
Aditi Mishra, principal of Delhi Public School (DPS), Sector 45, mentioned, “This is false information. We give admission to each kid sent to us via the training department.”
No student got EWS seat in 24 Gurugram schools in 2 years
![No student got EWS seat in 24 Gurugram schools in 2 years]()
Reviewed by Kailash
on
March 15, 2018
Rating:
