ALLAHABAD: The Allahabad prime courtroom has directed the state govt to give an explanation for as to why Urdu wasn't allowed as possibility in the exam to be held for the recruitment of 65,500 assistant lecturers in the state on March 12. This is for the primary time that assistant lecturers are being recruited without delay in the state.
Justice Ajay Bhanot, who was once hearing a writ petition filed by Mohammad Muntsim, further directed the state govt recommend to supply necessary information in this regard by March 7, the next date of hearing. The petitioner's recommend submitted in the courtroom that his consumer had opted for Urdu over Sanskrit as optional paper and cleared Basic Teachers Training (BTC) route in 2014.
The petitioner’s recommend submitted in the courtroom that his consumer had opted for Urdu over Sanskrit as optional paper and cleared Basic Teachers Training (BTC) route in 2014. Thereafter, in the Teachers Eligibility Test (TET) which had 3 optional papers — English, Sanskrit and Urdu — he once more opted for Urdu and cleared the test. Clearing TET is mandatory for a candidate in the state to apply for the submit of assistant trainer.
Subsequently, on January 9 the state govt issued a notification mentioning exam for the recruitment of 65,500 assistant lecturers in the state. However, to the utter marvel of the petitioner, he found that for the language paper which consisted of 40 marks, handiest Sanskrit, Hindi and English were provide as alternatives whilst Urdu was once excluded.
Hence, he filed the petition assailing the notification at the floor that all through his academic and training classes he had the option of Urdu and opted for it as consistent with rules.
Thus, the notification which excluded Urdu for the recruitment for assistant lecturers, is unfair and subsequently violative of the petitioner’s proper to equality as supplied underneath Article 14 of the Constitution. Moreover, exclusion of Urdu is discriminatory and subsequently the notification is illegal. In this backdrop, the courtroom was once asked to direct the state govt to both include Urdu in the language paper for the recruitment of assistant lecturers or cancel the exam. The order was once pronounced on February 28.
Justice Ajay Bhanot, who was once hearing a writ petition filed by Mohammad Muntsim, further directed the state govt recommend to supply necessary information in this regard by March 7, the next date of hearing. The petitioner's recommend submitted in the courtroom that his consumer had opted for Urdu over Sanskrit as optional paper and cleared Basic Teachers Training (BTC) route in 2014.
The petitioner’s recommend submitted in the courtroom that his consumer had opted for Urdu over Sanskrit as optional paper and cleared Basic Teachers Training (BTC) route in 2014. Thereafter, in the Teachers Eligibility Test (TET) which had 3 optional papers — English, Sanskrit and Urdu — he once more opted for Urdu and cleared the test. Clearing TET is mandatory for a candidate in the state to apply for the submit of assistant trainer.
Subsequently, on January 9 the state govt issued a notification mentioning exam for the recruitment of 65,500 assistant lecturers in the state. However, to the utter marvel of the petitioner, he found that for the language paper which consisted of 40 marks, handiest Sanskrit, Hindi and English were provide as alternatives whilst Urdu was once excluded.
Hence, he filed the petition assailing the notification at the floor that all through his academic and training classes he had the option of Urdu and opted for it as consistent with rules.
Thus, the notification which excluded Urdu for the recruitment for assistant lecturers, is unfair and subsequently violative of the petitioner’s proper to equality as supplied underneath Article 14 of the Constitution. Moreover, exclusion of Urdu is discriminatory and subsequently the notification is illegal. In this backdrop, the courtroom was once asked to direct the state govt to both include Urdu in the language paper for the recruitment of assistant lecturers or cancel the exam. The order was once pronounced on February 28.
Why is there no Urdu option in teachers' exam, HC asks UP government
![Why is there no Urdu option in teachers' exam, HC asks UP government]()
Reviewed by Kailash
on
March 04, 2018
Rating:
