Although a department bench of the Madras prime court docket has stayed an order by means of a unmarried judge bench which allowed the resumption of public demonstrations at the Marina, a piece of residents expressed hope that the federal government ban on protests at the venue will in the end be overturned.
Activists andstudentssaythatcurbing protestson theMarina is a violation of democratic rights assured by means of the Constitution but police beg to differ, bringing up potential legislation and order problems.
Retired judge of the Madras prime court docket Justice D Hariparanthaman mentioned permission will have to be grantedfor protests notonly at the Marina but additionally at any other venue desired by means of those in the hunt for to precise dissent as a way to give existence to Article 19 (1)(a) and (b) of the Constitution.
“What is the point in engaging in demonstrations atValluvar Kottam and Chepauk Guest House (puts earmarked by means of the city police for protests) where fewer people can gather?” mentioned Arun Nedunchezhiyan from Poovulagin Nanbargal, an environmental organisation.
On the opposite hand, BJP state presidentTamilisai Soundararajan mentioned, “Protesters will have to be prepared at the motive and no longer the venue. Overtly emphasising at the latter indicates that they're more focused on getting publicity.”
Asenior policeofficer mentioned allowing protests throughout this sort of vast expanse is bad. “During the jallikattu protests, some tried to leap into the sea andthe policehad a toughtimein rescuing them and bringing legislation and order below keep watch over.”
In reaction, students from University of Madras who participated in massive numbers at the protests final 12 months, recommended that a small portion of the seashore may well be earmarked for this purpose but a blanket ban is just a sign of the federal government’s weak point.
Activists andstudentssaythatcurbing protestson theMarina is a violation of democratic rights assured by means of the Constitution but police beg to differ, bringing up potential legislation and order problems.
Retired judge of the Madras prime court docket Justice D Hariparanthaman mentioned permission will have to be grantedfor protests notonly at the Marina but additionally at any other venue desired by means of those in the hunt for to precise dissent as a way to give existence to Article 19 (1)(a) and (b) of the Constitution.
“What is the point in engaging in demonstrations atValluvar Kottam and Chepauk Guest House (puts earmarked by means of the city police for protests) where fewer people can gather?” mentioned Arun Nedunchezhiyan from Poovulagin Nanbargal, an environmental organisation.
On the opposite hand, BJP state presidentTamilisai Soundararajan mentioned, “Protesters will have to be prepared at the motive and no longer the venue. Overtly emphasising at the latter indicates that they're more focused on getting publicity.”
Asenior policeofficer mentioned allowing protests throughout this sort of vast expanse is bad. “During the jallikattu protests, some tried to leap into the sea andthe policehad a toughtimein rescuing them and bringing legislation and order below keep watch over.”
In reaction, students from University of Madras who participated in massive numbers at the protests final 12 months, recommended that a small portion of the seashore may well be earmarked for this purpose but a blanket ban is just a sign of the federal government’s weak point.
Marina as protest venue splits city
![Marina as protest venue splits city]()
Reviewed by Kailash
on
April 30, 2018
Rating:
