LUDHIANA: An area courtroom has sentenced two persons to five-year rigorous imprisonment after retaining them in charge in a snatching case. The courtroom of additional periods pass judgement on Munish Singal also imposed a advantageous of Rs 2,500 every on the two convicts and in default of cost of fine they'll need to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for six months.
On October 18, 2016, Samrala police booked Pargat Singh and Kulwinder Singh of Lolhri Kalan in Samrala below Section 379 B (snatching) of Indian Penal Code (IPC) for snatching money and mobile phone from a Tempo driver.
As according to prosecution, on October 18, 2016, the complainant Karam Singh, in conjunction with Gurjant Singh, recorded his commentary towards Pargat Singh and one unknown individual declaring that on October 17, 2016, he unloaded the products from his tempo at a factory in Machhiwara and proceeded to Khanna. He added that when he was once near a petroleum pump, his car stopped after it’s diesel completed. He parked the car on a side and went to purchase diesel from a nearby petrol pump. When he reached near his car after buying the diesel, he noticed that two persons had been status nearby his car on a motorbike and at the moment the headlight of the motorbike was once off. He filled the diesel tank and when he was once about to open the door of his car, each the accused caught grasp of him and took him within the nearby fields and after thrashing him snatched his mobile phone and Rs 1,05,000 from him and later one in every of them took out the deck/tune gadget from his tempo. The incident came about at about 8p and both of them ran clear of the spot on their motorbike.
Khanna police later arrested the accused persons with intoxicant capsules and all the way through interrogation they disclosed about their involvement within the snatching case. Police later produced challan towards the accused within the courtroom of legislation. During the trial of the case within the courtroom, the accused stated that they are being falsely implicated within the case and no recovery was once made from them.
The prosecution tested the complainant, the owner of the tempo, investigating officer ASI Pavittar Singh, amongst others to prove charges towards the accused.
The courtroom observed that defence suggest has despite the fact that argued that the accused persons had been falsely implicated but no evidence has been led to substantiate the similar. It was once added that the argument that prosecution case may just no longer be proved as tune gadget and make contact with have no longer been recovered from the accused persons isn't tenable for there's each chance that the accused persons offered these items to get money.
On October 18, 2016, Samrala police booked Pargat Singh and Kulwinder Singh of Lolhri Kalan in Samrala below Section 379 B (snatching) of Indian Penal Code (IPC) for snatching money and mobile phone from a Tempo driver.
As according to prosecution, on October 18, 2016, the complainant Karam Singh, in conjunction with Gurjant Singh, recorded his commentary towards Pargat Singh and one unknown individual declaring that on October 17, 2016, he unloaded the products from his tempo at a factory in Machhiwara and proceeded to Khanna. He added that when he was once near a petroleum pump, his car stopped after it’s diesel completed. He parked the car on a side and went to purchase diesel from a nearby petrol pump. When he reached near his car after buying the diesel, he noticed that two persons had been status nearby his car on a motorbike and at the moment the headlight of the motorbike was once off. He filled the diesel tank and when he was once about to open the door of his car, each the accused caught grasp of him and took him within the nearby fields and after thrashing him snatched his mobile phone and Rs 1,05,000 from him and later one in every of them took out the deck/tune gadget from his tempo. The incident came about at about 8p and both of them ran clear of the spot on their motorbike.
Khanna police later arrested the accused persons with intoxicant capsules and all the way through interrogation they disclosed about their involvement within the snatching case. Police later produced challan towards the accused within the courtroom of legislation. During the trial of the case within the courtroom, the accused stated that they are being falsely implicated within the case and no recovery was once made from them.
The prosecution tested the complainant, the owner of the tempo, investigating officer ASI Pavittar Singh, amongst others to prove charges towards the accused.
The courtroom observed that defence suggest has despite the fact that argued that the accused persons had been falsely implicated but no evidence has been led to substantiate the similar. It was once added that the argument that prosecution case may just no longer be proved as tune gadget and make contact with have no longer been recovered from the accused persons isn't tenable for there's each chance that the accused persons offered these items to get money.
2 sentenced to 5-year rigorous imprisonment in snatching case
![2 sentenced to 5-year rigorous imprisonment in snatching case]()
Reviewed by Kailash
on
June 26, 2018
Rating:
