NEW DELHI: Taking robust exception to Committee of Administrators' (CoA) choice to stall BCCI's Special General Meeting + (SGM) on June 22, performing secretary Amitabh Chaudhary has accused Vinod Rai and Diana Edulji of "trying to prevent the General Body from discussing the decisions taken opaquely and without any authority".
ALSO READ: BCCI calls SGM but COA presentations the red flag
"It clearly and manifestly appears that the real reason for trying to stall and scuttle the meeting proposed to be held on 22.06.2018 is to prevent the General Body from discussing issues in which the decisions taken by the Committee whimsically, arbitrarily, opaquely and without any authority and even by keeping the office bearers in dark regarding the same, are likely to come up for discussion," Chaudhary wrote in his e mail to Rai, which is in ownership of PTI.
ALSO READ: CoA issues notice to stop SGM, angry participants say 'can't prevent us'
Chaudhary openly wondered the decisions taken by CoA when it comes to quite a lot of appointments.
He wondered "the large scale irregular appointments made on various posts in the BCCI having huge financial ramifications on the BCCI."
Chaudhary instructed Rai to "act in accordance with law".
"It is the most humble submission of the undersigned before the Committee of Administrators to kindly act in accordance with law, the Rules and Regulations of the BCCI as well as the orders of the Hon'ble Apex Court, and desist from hindering the lawful functioning of the Board of Control for Cricket in India."
The former Jharkhand most sensible cop made it transparent that decision to send an SGM notice was once taken simplest after affiliated gadgets demanded one.
"The notice of the SGM to be held on 22.06.2018 has been issued now not on the behest of the office bearers as is most likely the working out of the Committee but has been issued being certain underneath the Rules and Regulations of the BCCI, consequent upon the requisition of the member associations who constitute the BCCI.
"Once the requisite number of participants' requisitions is gained it is the will of the participants that has to prevail and now not that of the office bearers and even of the Committee."
Rai had yesterday made it transparent to his workers that no bill raised by representatives of the state gadgets for attending the mentioned meeting can be entertained as prior permission from CoA isn't taken.
Chaudhary discussed the rules in the present constitution underneath which an SGM can be convened
As per article 17 i) A Special General Meeting could also be convened by the Secretary (a) on a directive of the President, b) on a resolution of the Working Committee, c) on a requisition signed by now not less than 10 Full Members specially declaring the trade to be transacted at such meeting. No trade instead of the one for which the Special General Meeting is called can be transacted at such meeting.
ALSO READ: BCCI calls SGM but COA presentations the red flag
"It clearly and manifestly appears that the real reason for trying to stall and scuttle the meeting proposed to be held on 22.06.2018 is to prevent the General Body from discussing issues in which the decisions taken by the Committee whimsically, arbitrarily, opaquely and without any authority and even by keeping the office bearers in dark regarding the same, are likely to come up for discussion," Chaudhary wrote in his e mail to Rai, which is in ownership of PTI.
ALSO READ: CoA issues notice to stop SGM, angry participants say 'can't prevent us'
Chaudhary openly wondered the decisions taken by CoA when it comes to quite a lot of appointments.
He wondered "the large scale irregular appointments made on various posts in the BCCI having huge financial ramifications on the BCCI."
Chaudhary instructed Rai to "act in accordance with law".
"It is the most humble submission of the undersigned before the Committee of Administrators to kindly act in accordance with law, the Rules and Regulations of the BCCI as well as the orders of the Hon'ble Apex Court, and desist from hindering the lawful functioning of the Board of Control for Cricket in India."
The former Jharkhand most sensible cop made it transparent that decision to send an SGM notice was once taken simplest after affiliated gadgets demanded one.
"The notice of the SGM to be held on 22.06.2018 has been issued now not on the behest of the office bearers as is most likely the working out of the Committee but has been issued being certain underneath the Rules and Regulations of the BCCI, consequent upon the requisition of the member associations who constitute the BCCI.
"Once the requisite number of participants' requisitions is gained it is the will of the participants that has to prevail and now not that of the office bearers and even of the Committee."
Rai had yesterday made it transparent to his workers that no bill raised by representatives of the state gadgets for attending the mentioned meeting can be entertained as prior permission from CoA isn't taken.
Chaudhary discussed the rules in the present constitution underneath which an SGM can be convened
As per article 17 i) A Special General Meeting could also be convened by the Secretary (a) on a directive of the President, b) on a resolution of the Working Committee, c) on a requisition signed by now not less than 10 Full Members specially declaring the trade to be transacted at such meeting. No trade instead of the one for which the Special General Meeting is called can be transacted at such meeting.
CoA trying to keep lid on opaque decisions, accuses BCCI secretary
![CoA trying to keep lid on opaque decisions, accuses BCCI secretary]()
Reviewed by Kailash
on
June 02, 2018
Rating:
