LONDON: WikiLeaks on Sunday advised reporters not to file 140 other "false and defamatory" statements about its founder Julian Assange, who has been holed up in the Ecuadorean embassy in London since June 2012.
It used to be not straight away clear what induced the advice to media organisations, however WikiLeaks singled out Britain's Guardian newspaper for publishing what it stated used to be a false file about Assange. The Guardian did not straight away respond overdue on Sunday to a Reuters request for comment.
The Australian arrange WikiLeaks as a channel for publishing confidential knowledge from nameless resources. He is a hero to a few for exposing what supporters solid as government abuse of energy and for championing loose speech, however to others he is a revolt who has undermined the protection of the United States.
WikiLeaks angered Washington by means of publishing hundreds of thousands of secret U.S. diplomatic cables that laid bare incessantly highly vital US appraisals of global leaders from Russian President Vladimir Putin to participants of the Saudi royal circle of relatives.
"There is a pervasive climate of inaccurate claims about WikiLeaks and Julian Assange, including purposeful fabrications planted in large and otherwise 'reputable' media outlets," Wikileaks stated an electronic mail despatched to media organisations and marked "Confidential legal communication. Not for publication."
"Consequently journalists and publishers have a clear responsibility to carefully fact-check from primary sources and to consult the following list to ensure they are not spreading, and have not spread, defamatory falsehoods about WikiLeaks or Julian Assange."
WikiLeaks did not respond to repeated requests for comment.
The five,000-word electronic mail included 140 statements that WikiLeaks stated were false and defamatory, such because the statement that Assange had ever been an "agent or officer of any intelligence service".
WikiLeaks also stated it used to be false and defamatory to suggest that Assange, 47, had ever been employed by means of the Russian government or that he is, or has ever been, on the subject of the Russian state, the Kremlin or Putin.
Other items indexed as false and defamatory included extra non-public claims including that Assange bleaches his hair, that he is a hacker, that he has ever left out an animal or that he has poor non-public hygiene.
Assange made international headlines in early 2010 when WikiLeaks printed a categorised US military video appearing a 2007 attack by means of Apache helicopters that killed a dozen folks in Baghdad, including two Reuters news staff.
Later that yr, the gang launched over 90,000 secret paperwork detailing the US-led military campaign in Afghanistan, followed by means of virtually 400,000 internal U.S. military reviews detailing operations in Iraq.
More than 250,000 categorised cables from U.S. embassies followed, then virtually three million relationship back to 1973.
It used to be not straight away clear what induced the advice to media organisations, however WikiLeaks singled out Britain's Guardian newspaper for publishing what it stated used to be a false file about Assange. The Guardian did not straight away respond overdue on Sunday to a Reuters request for comment.
The Australian arrange WikiLeaks as a channel for publishing confidential knowledge from nameless resources. He is a hero to a few for exposing what supporters solid as government abuse of energy and for championing loose speech, however to others he is a revolt who has undermined the protection of the United States.
WikiLeaks angered Washington by means of publishing hundreds of thousands of secret U.S. diplomatic cables that laid bare incessantly highly vital US appraisals of global leaders from Russian President Vladimir Putin to participants of the Saudi royal circle of relatives.
"There is a pervasive climate of inaccurate claims about WikiLeaks and Julian Assange, including purposeful fabrications planted in large and otherwise 'reputable' media outlets," Wikileaks stated an electronic mail despatched to media organisations and marked "Confidential legal communication. Not for publication."
"Consequently journalists and publishers have a clear responsibility to carefully fact-check from primary sources and to consult the following list to ensure they are not spreading, and have not spread, defamatory falsehoods about WikiLeaks or Julian Assange."
WikiLeaks did not respond to repeated requests for comment.
The five,000-word electronic mail included 140 statements that WikiLeaks stated were false and defamatory, such because the statement that Assange had ever been an "agent or officer of any intelligence service".
WikiLeaks also stated it used to be false and defamatory to suggest that Assange, 47, had ever been employed by means of the Russian government or that he is, or has ever been, on the subject of the Russian state, the Kremlin or Putin.
Other items indexed as false and defamatory included extra non-public claims including that Assange bleaches his hair, that he is a hacker, that he has ever left out an animal or that he has poor non-public hygiene.
Assange made international headlines in early 2010 when WikiLeaks printed a categorised US military video appearing a 2007 attack by means of Apache helicopters that killed a dozen folks in Baghdad, including two Reuters news staff.
Later that yr, the gang launched over 90,000 secret paperwork detailing the US-led military campaign in Afghanistan, followed by means of virtually 400,000 internal U.S. military reviews detailing operations in Iraq.
More than 250,000 categorised cables from U.S. embassies followed, then virtually three million relationship back to 1973.
WikiLeaks tells reporters 140 things not to say about Assange
![WikiLeaks tells reporters 140 things not to say about Assange]()
Reviewed by Kailash
on
January 08, 2019
Rating:
