BENGALURU: The Karnataka State Commission for Protection of Child Rights (KSCPCR) has no power to reserve a faculty management to pay compensation, the prime court mentioned.
“After final touch of inquiry, the commission can simplest suggest to the federal government or authority concerned for grant of such intervening time relief (compensation). The commission has no power to direct the management to pay compensation,” Justice HT Narendra Prasad noticed in his order.
The judge quashed the September 17, 2014 order passed through the commission directing Zainabhiya Education Society, Holavanahalli in Tumakuru district to pay Rs 1 lakh intervening time compensation towards remedy of a college scholar who used to be injured whilst enjoying within the box.
The judge, then again, directed the commission to proceed with the pending case based on the Commissions for Protection of Child Rights Act, 2005.
The college management had contested the commission’s order, claiming that the intervening time compensation were made up our minds without undertaking an inquiry, as pondered below sections 14 and 15 of the Commissions for Protection of Child Rights Act, 2005. The management claimed it had paid for the remedy of the boy, Ashvith Varmam, and paid Rs 70,000 to Narasimhamurthy, his father.
On July 24, 2014, Ashvith sustained an eye harm whilst enjoying within the box. He used to be to begin with taken to a nearby govt hospital after which to Koratagere. On an eye specialist’s recommendation, he used to be taken to Minto Eye Hospital in Bengaluru. The college management bore the associated fee and paid Rs 70,000 to his father.
“After final touch of inquiry, the commission can simplest suggest to the federal government or authority concerned for grant of such intervening time relief (compensation). The commission has no power to direct the management to pay compensation,” Justice HT Narendra Prasad noticed in his order.
The judge quashed the September 17, 2014 order passed through the commission directing Zainabhiya Education Society, Holavanahalli in Tumakuru district to pay Rs 1 lakh intervening time compensation towards remedy of a college scholar who used to be injured whilst enjoying within the box.
The judge, then again, directed the commission to proceed with the pending case based on the Commissions for Protection of Child Rights Act, 2005.
The college management had contested the commission’s order, claiming that the intervening time compensation were made up our minds without undertaking an inquiry, as pondered below sections 14 and 15 of the Commissions for Protection of Child Rights Act, 2005. The management claimed it had paid for the remedy of the boy, Ashvith Varmam, and paid Rs 70,000 to Narasimhamurthy, his father.
On July 24, 2014, Ashvith sustained an eye harm whilst enjoying within the box. He used to be to begin with taken to a nearby govt hospital after which to Koratagere. On an eye specialist’s recommendation, he used to be taken to Minto Eye Hospital in Bengaluru. The college management bore the associated fee and paid Rs 70,000 to his father.
'Child rights panel can't order compensation'
!['Child rights panel can't order compensation']()
Reviewed by Kailash
on
February 26, 2019
Rating:
