THANE: BJP corporator Ashok Raul was once on Saturday disqualified through the district sessions court docket after it was once proved that he had no longer disclosed information on his legal previous, as mandated through election laws.
Joint civil pass judgement on S S Indalkar upheld claims through Raul's rival and Shiv Sena candidate, Mandar Vichare, who had had moved court docket right away after the civic polls in 2017.
Raul, who had rebelled from NCP and joined BJP, had gained from ward 12-D, which is close to Siddheshwar Lake within the Old City.
Vichare, nephew of sitting Sena Member of Parliament Rajan Vichare, was once trounced within the polls.
While disqualifying Raul, the pass judgement on mentioned within the order that Vichare will probably be declared elected and represent ward 12-D for the remaining of the term.
According to the petitioner Vichare, Raul had in his election declaration failed to mention the legal case in his nomination shape.
Advocate Munir Ahmed, who gave the impression for Vichare, depended on Supreme Court directions that lay down that non-disclosure of legal cases will entail disqualification and the court docket permitted it and disqualified Raul.
He depended on a judgement in terms of Krishnamurty versus Shivakumar and others, where the SC had given the ruling on segment 123(2) of Representation of People's Act, 1951.
Raul told TOI, "I shall appeal against the order in the higher court as I feel there is an error in this court's order."
Ashok Raul was once disqualified as he didn't reveal information on his legal previous, a district sessions court docket pass judgement on mentioned. Raul, who had give up NCP to sign up for BJP, mentioned that he's going to enchantment in opposition to the order in a better court docket
Joint civil pass judgement on S S Indalkar upheld claims through Raul's rival and Shiv Sena candidate, Mandar Vichare, who had had moved court docket right away after the civic polls in 2017.
Raul, who had rebelled from NCP and joined BJP, had gained from ward 12-D, which is close to Siddheshwar Lake within the Old City.
Vichare, nephew of sitting Sena Member of Parliament Rajan Vichare, was once trounced within the polls.
While disqualifying Raul, the pass judgement on mentioned within the order that Vichare will probably be declared elected and represent ward 12-D for the remaining of the term.
According to the petitioner Vichare, Raul had in his election declaration failed to mention the legal case in his nomination shape.
Advocate Munir Ahmed, who gave the impression for Vichare, depended on Supreme Court directions that lay down that non-disclosure of legal cases will entail disqualification and the court docket permitted it and disqualified Raul.
He depended on a judgement in terms of Krishnamurty versus Shivakumar and others, where the SC had given the ruling on segment 123(2) of Representation of People's Act, 1951.
Raul told TOI, "I shall appeal against the order in the higher court as I feel there is an error in this court's order."
Ashok Raul was once disqualified as he didn't reveal information on his legal previous, a district sessions court docket pass judgement on mentioned. Raul, who had give up NCP to sign up for BJP, mentioned that he's going to enchantment in opposition to the order in a better court docket
BJP corporator disqualified by court in Thane
![BJP corporator disqualified by court in Thane]()
Reviewed by Kailash
on
March 17, 2019
Rating:
