NAGPUR: The State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission’s circuit bench right here discovered Wockhardt Hospital guilty of alleged clinical negligence and directed it to pay Rs20 lakh compensation to the complainant. Management of the health facility based totally at Shankar Nagar was further asked to pay the volume with 9% pastime from December 11, 2013.
Complainant Anil Gupta had admitted his spouse to the health facility on August 2, 2011, for clinical consultation, investigation, and remedy as she was suffering from headache. After CT scan, it was found out that she was suffering from ‘hydrocephalus’. Later, a ‘VP shunt surgical treatment’ was effectively carried out on her on August 11, 2011.
Her condition improved and when she was about to be discharged, the doctors steered she go through a CT scan. While being shifted from the bed, she accidentally fell down from the stretcher because of alleged mishandling by the workforce.
She sustained severe injuries. Her VP shunt was dislodged and she developed a clot in the brain. Even after repeated requests, the CT scan was allegedly no longer performed until nighttime.
On September 21, 2011, she was made to go through a ‘burr hole surgical treatment’ on account of dislodgment of VP shunt. She may no longer be saved despite the fact that consultants doctors have been treating her.
Gupta then knocked the shopper forum’s doorways thru counsels Tushar Mandlekar and Rohan Malviya claiming negligence at the part of health facility’s government ended in his spouse’s premature dying. He claimed that the workforce dealing with her belonged to cleansing section and wasn’t certified in nursing, which is mandatory as in step with the Maharashtra Nursing Act.
None of the doctors have been provide while she was being shifted, Gupta claimed and likewise stated that the health facility tried to modify the ‘cause of dying’ of the patient.
The health facility argued that the patient was receiving most cancers remedy since 2011 and that she died because of most cancers.
The forum held that even supposing deceased was suffering from most cancers, she wasn’t given proper remedy for brain damage. The judges discovered it a fit case of clinical negligence and directed Wockhardt to pay the Rs20 lakh compensation.
(With inputs from Samidha Raut)
Complainant Anil Gupta had admitted his spouse to the health facility on August 2, 2011, for clinical consultation, investigation, and remedy as she was suffering from headache. After CT scan, it was found out that she was suffering from ‘hydrocephalus’. Later, a ‘VP shunt surgical treatment’ was effectively carried out on her on August 11, 2011.
Her condition improved and when she was about to be discharged, the doctors steered she go through a CT scan. While being shifted from the bed, she accidentally fell down from the stretcher because of alleged mishandling by the workforce.
She sustained severe injuries. Her VP shunt was dislodged and she developed a clot in the brain. Even after repeated requests, the CT scan was allegedly no longer performed until nighttime.
On September 21, 2011, she was made to go through a ‘burr hole surgical treatment’ on account of dislodgment of VP shunt. She may no longer be saved despite the fact that consultants doctors have been treating her.
Gupta then knocked the shopper forum’s doorways thru counsels Tushar Mandlekar and Rohan Malviya claiming negligence at the part of health facility’s government ended in his spouse’s premature dying. He claimed that the workforce dealing with her belonged to cleansing section and wasn’t certified in nursing, which is mandatory as in step with the Maharashtra Nursing Act.
None of the doctors have been provide while she was being shifted, Gupta claimed and likewise stated that the health facility tried to modify the ‘cause of dying’ of the patient.
The health facility argued that the patient was receiving most cancers remedy since 2011 and that she died because of most cancers.
The forum held that even supposing deceased was suffering from most cancers, she wasn’t given proper remedy for brain damage. The judges discovered it a fit case of clinical negligence and directed Wockhardt to pay the Rs20 lakh compensation.
(With inputs from Samidha Raut)
Pay 20 lakh for ‘med negligence’, Wockhardt told
![Pay 20 lakh for ‘med negligence’, Wockhardt told]()
Reviewed by Kailash
on
April 23, 2019
Rating:
