MUMBAI: Non-consummation is grounds to claim a wedding as null, the Bombay top court docket has dominated.
A couple from Kolhapur have been combating felony battles for the reason that day they were given married nine years in the past—the girl claimed that the man had fraudulently married her by way of getting her to signal blank paperwork. She had sought that the wedding be annulled, whilst he had adversarial it.
Justice Mridula Bhatkar said that there was no evidence of fraud, but struck down the wedding at the grounds that there was no evidence that there have been sexual family members between the couple.
“One of a very powerful objects of marriage is a regularisation of sexual relationship between the 2 parties, and within the absence of this sort of relationship, the article of marriage is annoyed. Even a single prevalence of sexual intercourse quantities to consummation of marriage,” said Justice Bhatkar. “In the present case, when the parties did not keep in combination even for a single day and no evidence is introduced by way of the husband when he claims that there was sexual relationship, then in absence of such evidence... the girl establishes the case of non-consummation of marriage.”
The man had claimed that the couple has had sexual family members and he or she had even were given pregnant, but the court docket pointed out that no evidence of the gynaecologist, concerning the pregnancy check have been furnished. The court docket said that it had attempted to advise the couple to settle their variations but had failed.
“The parties have change into very bitter and vindictive against every other and blame other party, has ruined his/her nine years of lifestyles. This angle is going to damage their additional more years... An irretrievable marriage is not a floor under Special Marriage Act but non-consummation of marriage is a floor,” Justice Bhatkar held.
The case dates again to 2009, when the girl was 21 and the man was 24. According to the girl, the man had were given her to signal blank paperwork or even took her prior to the registrar, but she did not realise it was marriage paperwork.
When she realised the information, she sought annulment of the wedding.
A trial court docket approved her plea and granted annulment, but an appellate court docket dominated in favour of the husband.
The top court docket rejected claims of fraud and pointed out that she was an educated woman—a graduate-—and it was tough to consider that she have been deceived to signal the paperwork.
A couple from Kolhapur have been combating felony battles for the reason that day they were given married nine years in the past—the girl claimed that the man had fraudulently married her by way of getting her to signal blank paperwork. She had sought that the wedding be annulled, whilst he had adversarial it.
Justice Mridula Bhatkar said that there was no evidence of fraud, but struck down the wedding at the grounds that there was no evidence that there have been sexual family members between the couple.
“One of a very powerful objects of marriage is a regularisation of sexual relationship between the 2 parties, and within the absence of this sort of relationship, the article of marriage is annoyed. Even a single prevalence of sexual intercourse quantities to consummation of marriage,” said Justice Bhatkar. “In the present case, when the parties did not keep in combination even for a single day and no evidence is introduced by way of the husband when he claims that there was sexual relationship, then in absence of such evidence... the girl establishes the case of non-consummation of marriage.”
The man had claimed that the couple has had sexual family members and he or she had even were given pregnant, but the court docket pointed out that no evidence of the gynaecologist, concerning the pregnancy check have been furnished. The court docket said that it had attempted to advise the couple to settle their variations but had failed.
“The parties have change into very bitter and vindictive against every other and blame other party, has ruined his/her nine years of lifestyles. This angle is going to damage their additional more years... An irretrievable marriage is not a floor under Special Marriage Act but non-consummation of marriage is a floor,” Justice Bhatkar held.
The case dates again to 2009, when the girl was 21 and the man was 24. According to the girl, the man had were given her to signal blank paperwork or even took her prior to the registrar, but she did not realise it was marriage paperwork.
When she realised the information, she sought annulment of the wedding.
A trial court docket approved her plea and granted annulment, but an appellate court docket dominated in favour of the husband.
The top court docket rejected claims of fraud and pointed out that she was an educated woman—a graduate-—and it was tough to consider that she have been deceived to signal the paperwork.
No sex since wedding, HC nullifies 9-yr 'marriage'
![No sex since wedding, HC nullifies 9-yr 'marriage']()
Reviewed by Kailash
on
April 30, 2018
Rating:
