There has been reasonably slightly of stench emanating from the National Cricket Academy (NCA) - the injury-management, rehabilitation and grooming centre at the M Chinnaswamy Stadium in Bangalore - these past few weeks. Those reeking of it stand neglected as Indian cricket, embroiled in endless criminal battles, struggles to seek out its feet.
ALSO READ: Indian pacers would possibly fight in Bhuvnehswar's absence
The cricket board never fails to remind the arena of the clout it wields, however refuses to peer the big picture again house. As issues stand, that picture is bleak. The truth of the subject is that the Board of Control for Cricket in India's (BCCI) maximum prized establishment, the NCA - which a decade or extra ago had set attractions on rubbing shoulders with Australia's well-established Centre of Excellence - is now its largest liability.
How else does one describe a cricket academy where a cricketer has no thought who's getting ready his health record?
The horror tales that get churned out from the NCA each day are never-ending. The leader physiotherapist at the academy - as highlighted lately through TOI - doesn't mind sending cricketers' health reviews to a personal health facility in which he was a director. It hasn't mattered to these working the affairs of Indian cricket that in spite of all of the monetary equipment at their disposal, there may be an evident battle staring them in the face.
The BCCI, for all of the authority it likes to move stamping around, sacked an in a foreign country worker at the NCA in July final year bringing up battle of passion. In truth, it used to be the employee's call for for a revised pay-hike - so as to steer clear of battle - that noticed him move.
ALSO READ: Saha's rehab plan under scanner
The curious case of Wriddhiman Saha's injury - thumb or shoulder or thumb and shoulder or first thumb, then shoulder, it's all still a thriller but - is a living proof. Five days ago, the BCCI posted all the timeline of Saha's injury on its website and the main points of it are as confusing at the NCA's personal ways of functioning.
From MRI to ultrasound to guided more than one injections, supervision, consultation, rehabilitation, presentation - all kinds of fancy phrases find a point out in the timeline, apart from for the most important issue: BCCI both had no clue about Saha's shoulder injury, or at least selected not to make it public, till it used to be time for the selectors to pick out the squad for the excursion of England.
The 2nd essential bit in Saha's injury timeline is the next line: "Appropriate doctor consultations were done with Dr Srikanth Narayanaswamy, sports physician, who then advised an ultrasound guided injection, which was duly done."
Who is Dr Narayanaswamy? Is he a consultant with the BCCI in any official capability? Has the board offered this doctor a freelance? On what grounds used to be this person consulted? Nobody in the board apart from for one specific physiotherapist has any thought.
What's worse is that even the avid gamers whose reviews are being referred to this person have no idea what official capability he holds in Indian cricket. "It's that bad. And trust me, when I say bad, I'm not underplaying the seriousness of it at all," a senior India cricketer stated.
Also, from the time Saha returned from South Africa to the time his shoulder surgery used to be advised, who used to be accountable for his rehab? Who in the board used to be monitoring his day-to-day progress? And on what grounds used to be he allowed to play in the IPL?
In the case of all-rounder Bhuvneshwar Kumar, who will fail to spot the first 3 Test suits in England, there used to be miscommunication between BCCI's personal personnel. As one BCCI member puts it: "There's no detailed note on the injuries to contracted players in the last one year. Which doctor diagnosed the injury? What was prescribed? Did the rehabilitation happen as was projected initially? Were there any deviations? Were the injuries in competition injuries (read IPL) or were the injuries picked?"
The Indian nationwide group, mockingly, has put the onus on itself to make health the top priority, an effort for which person avid gamers need to be lauded. The question that BCCI - in the present case, the CoA - needs to answer is, what precisely is the protocol at the NCA where the line of conversation is concerned?
For starters, the NCA committee, one who used to be held under dispute through the CoA through their interpretation of the Supreme Court order, is a non-existent one in this day and age. In the light of the similar, there is not any word at the reporting structure at the academy.
An e mail written to the BCCI lately, through a member of the Board itself, highlights some uneasy questions: (What is) the reporting structure in the NCA? Do the trainers report to the physios or do the physios report to the trainers? How precisely does this paintings? Who makes a decision at the process remedy and the workload of the avid gamers? In the case of a distinction of view between a physio and a instructor, whose view prevails? What is the exact nature of relation between the top physio at the NCA and the physio of the Indian cricket group? How are the workloads of the senior group participants managed?
The BCCI-CoA will have grand plans for the academy going forward. However, in the present context, these questions raise severe problems that want immediate solutions.
ALSO READ: Indian pacers would possibly fight in Bhuvnehswar's absence
The cricket board never fails to remind the arena of the clout it wields, however refuses to peer the big picture again house. As issues stand, that picture is bleak. The truth of the subject is that the Board of Control for Cricket in India's (BCCI) maximum prized establishment, the NCA - which a decade or extra ago had set attractions on rubbing shoulders with Australia's well-established Centre of Excellence - is now its largest liability.
How else does one describe a cricket academy where a cricketer has no thought who's getting ready his health record?
The horror tales that get churned out from the NCA each day are never-ending. The leader physiotherapist at the academy - as highlighted lately through TOI - doesn't mind sending cricketers' health reviews to a personal health facility in which he was a director. It hasn't mattered to these working the affairs of Indian cricket that in spite of all of the monetary equipment at their disposal, there may be an evident battle staring them in the face.
The BCCI, for all of the authority it likes to move stamping around, sacked an in a foreign country worker at the NCA in July final year bringing up battle of passion. In truth, it used to be the employee's call for for a revised pay-hike - so as to steer clear of battle - that noticed him move.
ALSO READ: Saha's rehab plan under scanner
The curious case of Wriddhiman Saha's injury - thumb or shoulder or thumb and shoulder or first thumb, then shoulder, it's all still a thriller but - is a living proof. Five days ago, the BCCI posted all the timeline of Saha's injury on its website and the main points of it are as confusing at the NCA's personal ways of functioning.
From MRI to ultrasound to guided more than one injections, supervision, consultation, rehabilitation, presentation - all kinds of fancy phrases find a point out in the timeline, apart from for the most important issue: BCCI both had no clue about Saha's shoulder injury, or at least selected not to make it public, till it used to be time for the selectors to pick out the squad for the excursion of England.
The 2nd essential bit in Saha's injury timeline is the next line: "Appropriate doctor consultations were done with Dr Srikanth Narayanaswamy, sports physician, who then advised an ultrasound guided injection, which was duly done."
Who is Dr Narayanaswamy? Is he a consultant with the BCCI in any official capability? Has the board offered this doctor a freelance? On what grounds used to be this person consulted? Nobody in the board apart from for one specific physiotherapist has any thought.
What's worse is that even the avid gamers whose reviews are being referred to this person have no idea what official capability he holds in Indian cricket. "It's that bad. And trust me, when I say bad, I'm not underplaying the seriousness of it at all," a senior India cricketer stated.
Also, from the time Saha returned from South Africa to the time his shoulder surgery used to be advised, who used to be accountable for his rehab? Who in the board used to be monitoring his day-to-day progress? And on what grounds used to be he allowed to play in the IPL?
In the case of all-rounder Bhuvneshwar Kumar, who will fail to spot the first 3 Test suits in England, there used to be miscommunication between BCCI's personal personnel. As one BCCI member puts it: "There's no detailed note on the injuries to contracted players in the last one year. Which doctor diagnosed the injury? What was prescribed? Did the rehabilitation happen as was projected initially? Were there any deviations? Were the injuries in competition injuries (read IPL) or were the injuries picked?"
The Indian nationwide group, mockingly, has put the onus on itself to make health the top priority, an effort for which person avid gamers need to be lauded. The question that BCCI - in the present case, the CoA - needs to answer is, what precisely is the protocol at the NCA where the line of conversation is concerned?
For starters, the NCA committee, one who used to be held under dispute through the CoA through their interpretation of the Supreme Court order, is a non-existent one in this day and age. In the light of the similar, there is not any word at the reporting structure at the academy.
An e mail written to the BCCI lately, through a member of the Board itself, highlights some uneasy questions: (What is) the reporting structure in the NCA? Do the trainers report to the physios or do the physios report to the trainers? How precisely does this paintings? Who makes a decision at the process remedy and the workload of the avid gamers? In the case of a distinction of view between a physio and a instructor, whose view prevails? What is the exact nature of relation between the top physio at the NCA and the physio of the Indian cricket group? How are the workloads of the senior group participants managed?
The BCCI-CoA will have grand plans for the academy going forward. However, in the present context, these questions raise severe problems that want immediate solutions.
Bhuvneshwar and Saha paying for NCA's haphazardness?
![Bhuvneshwar and Saha paying for NCA's haphazardness?]()
Reviewed by Kailash
on
July 27, 2018
Rating:
