LUDHIANA: A neighborhood court docket has sentenced two individuals to 10 years rigorous imprisonment for the gang-rape of a 12-year-old lady. The court docket of additional sessions judge Jagdeep Kaur Virk additionally imposed a effective of Rs 50,000 every on the two convicts, and in default of payment of good, they're going to must additional go through a easy rigorous imprisonment for 6 months every.
On January 18, 2013, Daresi police had booked three accused, elderly 20, 18, and a juvenile below sections 376(2)(g) of the IPC for gang-rape of a 12-year-old. The survivor’s father mentioned he was once a rickshaw-puller with three kids, and the survivor was once the middle kid, finding out at school three. He mentioned he was once known as by way of his daughter’s faculty instructor a day prior to the incident and was once told to stay a vigil on her as she had a mobile phone. He brought his daughter home from faculty in conjunction with her mobile phone.
But in his absence, his daughter took out the sim-card from the mobile phone, and after destroying it, threw away the card. Later on, one phone quantity was once traced from her notice book. The lady’s instructor made a decision on the quantity, and the recipient (the 20-year-old accused) disclosed his name. The instructor then told the woman’s father that some fallacious act might have been committed on his daughter. This aroused the father’s suspicion who came to know that his daughter was once suffering from stomach-ache however had now not disclosed it to him. Later, he despatched his daughter together with his sister to a hospital for scientific check-up, the place doctors disclosed that she was once pregnant.
When he requested the survivor about all the incident in presence of his sister, the woman disclosed that two months in the past, three boys dwelling in their locality, had committed gang-rape on her in a room built within the graveyard, which was once within the compound of a temple. They had additionally threatened her that during case she knowledgeable him concerning the incident to any individual, they'd kill her brother. Out of concern, she did not divulge the incident to any individual. Her father then lodged a police criticism on January 18, and then Daresi police registered a case. Police later arrested the 3 accused, certainly one of whom was once a juvenile, and produced a challan towards two of them (who were majors) within the court docket.
During the trial of the case, each the accused pleaded false implication, with defence claiming that the father of the survivor did not like the truth that she used to talk to one of the accused. Additional public prosecutor for the state however pleaded for punishment of the accused on the foundation of prosecution proof — together with statements of the survivor, her father, aunt (father’s sister), and main of her faculty, among others — and documentary proof. The defence suggest, on the other hand, pleaded that one had by no means heard of any occurrence of rape within the compound of a temple as alleged by way of the complainant, and had the incident taken place, it could have come to everyone’s wisdom. He mentioned the accused were being falsely implicated. He additionally contended that the survivor was once a smart lady who knew the way to use her mobile phone without her father’s wisdom, and her good friend used to talk to her boyfriend from her mobile.
The judge mentioned that the truth that the woman kept a mobile without her father’s wisdom was once insignificant, and did not refute the truth that the accused had committed rape on the minor.
On January 18, 2013, Daresi police had booked three accused, elderly 20, 18, and a juvenile below sections 376(2)(g) of the IPC for gang-rape of a 12-year-old. The survivor’s father mentioned he was once a rickshaw-puller with three kids, and the survivor was once the middle kid, finding out at school three. He mentioned he was once known as by way of his daughter’s faculty instructor a day prior to the incident and was once told to stay a vigil on her as she had a mobile phone. He brought his daughter home from faculty in conjunction with her mobile phone.
But in his absence, his daughter took out the sim-card from the mobile phone, and after destroying it, threw away the card. Later on, one phone quantity was once traced from her notice book. The lady’s instructor made a decision on the quantity, and the recipient (the 20-year-old accused) disclosed his name. The instructor then told the woman’s father that some fallacious act might have been committed on his daughter. This aroused the father’s suspicion who came to know that his daughter was once suffering from stomach-ache however had now not disclosed it to him. Later, he despatched his daughter together with his sister to a hospital for scientific check-up, the place doctors disclosed that she was once pregnant.
When he requested the survivor about all the incident in presence of his sister, the woman disclosed that two months in the past, three boys dwelling in their locality, had committed gang-rape on her in a room built within the graveyard, which was once within the compound of a temple. They had additionally threatened her that during case she knowledgeable him concerning the incident to any individual, they'd kill her brother. Out of concern, she did not divulge the incident to any individual. Her father then lodged a police criticism on January 18, and then Daresi police registered a case. Police later arrested the 3 accused, certainly one of whom was once a juvenile, and produced a challan towards two of them (who were majors) within the court docket.
During the trial of the case, each the accused pleaded false implication, with defence claiming that the father of the survivor did not like the truth that she used to talk to one of the accused. Additional public prosecutor for the state however pleaded for punishment of the accused on the foundation of prosecution proof — together with statements of the survivor, her father, aunt (father’s sister), and main of her faculty, among others — and documentary proof. The defence suggest, on the other hand, pleaded that one had by no means heard of any occurrence of rape within the compound of a temple as alleged by way of the complainant, and had the incident taken place, it could have come to everyone’s wisdom. He mentioned the accused were being falsely implicated. He additionally contended that the survivor was once a smart lady who knew the way to use her mobile phone without her father’s wisdom, and her good friend used to talk to her boyfriend from her mobile.
The judge mentioned that the truth that the woman kept a mobile without her father’s wisdom was once insignificant, and did not refute the truth that the accused had committed rape on the minor.
Duo to spend 10 years in jail for raping 12-year-old
![Duo to spend 10 years in jail for raping 12-year-old]()
Reviewed by Kailash
on
May 27, 2018
Rating:
