JALANDHAR: The Delhi Sikh Gurdwara Management Committee (DSGMC) has recommended the Justice S N Dhingra-headed special investigation staff (SIT) re-examining the 1984 anti-Sikh rebellion circumstances to analyze the role of Madhya Pradesh leader minister Kamal Nath. The DSGMC, in its complaint, has discussed the FIR registered at Parliament Street police station at the assault on Gurudwara Rakab Ganj, where two Sikhs had been burned alive on November 1, 1984.
The DSGMC, in its software filed via its basic secretary Manjinder Singh Sirsa, said that Gurdwara Rakab Ganj is underneath the management of the DSGMC, and the complaint is being filed as victim. The complaint reads, “Police arrested five individuals at the spot and filed a charge sheet in opposition to them, but police with the view to defend the primary accused, Nath, didn't even inquire about his role. Nath was there at the Gurudwara Rakab Ganj when it was set on hearth and two Sikhs had been burnt alive. It was the duty of police to inquire, but unfortunately because of his influence police didn't do so. Police filed a chargesheet in opposition to five accused who had been arrested, but later discharged by means of the trial courtroom.”
It has cited a contemporary Delhi prime courtroom judgment of November 28, where it held that an individual, who is part of a mob and mob is committing offences ...is prone to be punished for the offence underneath Section 1489 of the IPC. It has additionally cited the Delhi HC judgment in Sajjan Kumar case where it criticized the police for seeking to assist, defend and favour robust other folks. “The case FIR No. 60/184 is obvious example of the way police has tried to defend the accused.”
The DSGMC’s complaint mentions the police never tested journalist Sanjay Suri who had reported about Nath’s presence and later submitted his affidavit to Justice Ranganath Mishra Commission. It has additionally stated that any other eyewitness Mukhtiar Singh additionally gave his statement to the commission, describing Nath’s role, but regardless of the sturdy evidence police failed to correctly examine.
The DSGMC, in its software filed via its basic secretary Manjinder Singh Sirsa, said that Gurdwara Rakab Ganj is underneath the management of the DSGMC, and the complaint is being filed as victim. The complaint reads, “Police arrested five individuals at the spot and filed a charge sheet in opposition to them, but police with the view to defend the primary accused, Nath, didn't even inquire about his role. Nath was there at the Gurudwara Rakab Ganj when it was set on hearth and two Sikhs had been burnt alive. It was the duty of police to inquire, but unfortunately because of his influence police didn't do so. Police filed a chargesheet in opposition to five accused who had been arrested, but later discharged by means of the trial courtroom.”
It has cited a contemporary Delhi prime courtroom judgment of November 28, where it held that an individual, who is part of a mob and mob is committing offences ...is prone to be punished for the offence underneath Section 1489 of the IPC. It has additionally cited the Delhi HC judgment in Sajjan Kumar case where it criticized the police for seeking to assist, defend and favour robust other folks. “The case FIR No. 60/184 is obvious example of the way police has tried to defend the accused.”
The DSGMC’s complaint mentions the police never tested journalist Sanjay Suri who had reported about Nath’s presence and later submitted his affidavit to Justice Ranganath Mishra Commission. It has additionally stated that any other eyewitness Mukhtiar Singh additionally gave his statement to the commission, describing Nath’s role, but regardless of the sturdy evidence police failed to correctly examine.
1984: DSGMC wants SIT to look into Kamal Nath’s role
![1984: DSGMC wants SIT to look into Kamal Nath’s role]()
Reviewed by Kailash
on
December 29, 2018
Rating:
